Subscriber Login

Receive Email Updates

CURRENT ISSUE

Inside outsider
Despite past, Newt Gingrich has pedaled his way to evangelical support
FULL STORY

Table of Contents E-zine/pdf Version iPad Version Kindle Version Mobile Version RSS/Social Media Featured Content Archives Classifieds WEB EXTRAS NEWS/COMMENTARY COLUMNISTS MOVIE REVIEWS RADIO OTHER WORLD NEWS GROUP WEBSITES MEDIA GUIDE CUSTOMER SUPPORT SUBSCRIBE DONATE STORE

WORLD on Facebook

RSS Feed

 
 DISPATCHES | Issue: "Year in Review 1997" December 27, 1997

The Buzz (Publick Occurrences)

NEED-TO-KNOW NEWS

Parental supervision?

The alleged mastermind behind the Satanic-inspired shootings at a rural Mississippi high school went free on Tuesday after a judge allowed him to post a $75,000 bond. Grant Boyette, 18, leader of a group known as the Kroth, is accused of convincing 16-year-old Luke Woodham to open fire on his classmates at Pearl High School. Two died and seven others were wounded in the October shooting spree. The court stipulated that Mr. Boyette must be under constant parental supervision during his release-small comfort to many, since his parents apparently never supervised the animal sacrifices and other Satanic rituals that Mr. Boyette allegedly led over the years.

What the Pentagon panel didn't address

Those who believed the military could be used as a social laboratory to achieve ends prescribed by politicians who never served have been rebuked. A Pentagon-appointed study panel, headed by former Sen. Nancy Kassebaum Baker, remains committed to "gender integration," but not until after a few weeks of segregation. "By separating men and women in their own barracks, you would have fewer disciplinary problems and a better sense of unit cohesion and team building," the panel concluded. What the panel didn't address is how training will be toughened if women again fail to meet higher standards. The objective of the gender feminists has been total equality between male and female service personnel. So what will happen when the irresistible force of politics comes up against the immovable object of military strength? Something's gotta give. The Clinton administration has been the primary impetus behind sex-integrated basic training. The results have been obvious for some time to those not blinded by politics. After touring U.S. military facilities last summer, Rep. Stephen Buyer (R-Ind.), chairman of the subcommittee on military personnel, told the Navy Times: "Wherever we were ... there was a general complaint about the product coming out of basic training.... They've weakened the standards, and we're concerned about it." How weak are they? At the Great Lakes Naval Training Center recruits are shown a video telling them that "physically, anybody can make it through boot camp," a statement that devalues the prestige associated with conquering boot camp and the toughness recruits need to develop. According to Time magazine, recruits at Great Lakes no longer drill with rifles, because the Navy (which used rifles in training until 1996) now regards them as anachronistic. And, my personal favorite, recruits are issued a "blue card" that they are encouraged to hand to their trainer whenever they feel discouraged or stressed. The Army could call its training "sneaker camp," because recruits no longer run with combat boots. The Army has substituted jogging apparel. Drill instructors have been warned not to berate their recruits verbally. And basic combat skills are receiving less emphasis. According to a 1997 report by the Army Inspector General, "There is no clearly articulated or enforced standard for soldierization skills to graduate from Initial Entry Training." Are we willing to pay the price of a weakened military so that politicians and the gender feminists can have their way in the emasculation of our armed services? Tragically, they will have failed to equip a fighting force to prevail in the next war when they are needed to defend their country and themselves. Cal Thomas, © 1997, Los Angeles Times Syndicate

ACCESS THIS ARTICLE IMMEDIATELY AND RECEIVE ONE MONTH OF ONLINE ACCESS AND TWO ISSUES OF WORLD'S PRINT EDITION—ALL FOR JUST $5. SEE THE NEW SUBSCRIBER BOX BELOW.

IF YOU ARE ALREADY A PRINT OR ONLINE-ONLY SUBSCRIBER, PLEASE LOG IN BELOW.

The complete article is ~2686 words long

Current Subscriber

Magazine
Subscriber
Login Now
Online-Only
Subscriber
Login Now

Click here for other subscription options that also will enable you to access this article.

New Subscriber

Lock Secure form
Receive instant access to this article and one-month access to WORLD's subscriber-only online content — plus, enjoy 2 issues of WORLD's print edition — all for just $5*.

Want a different type of subscription? Click the following links for Online-Only Subscription options or Print Subscription options (which include online subscription access).

Payment Information

Name State Card Type
Address Zip Card Number
City Email Expiration Date
/
  Phone Number  
   
Offer Terms
Subscribers Advantage Automatic Renewal Program You authorize WORLD Magazine to charge your credit/debit card at the price listed above and in time to renew your subscription to WORLD Magazine, without interruption, before the start of the first 6-month term (for $34.95) and then thereafter at 6-month terms at the regular rate then in effect unless you tell us to stop. You may cancel at any time during your subscription and receive a full refund on all unmailed issues. If your credit/debit card cannot be charged, we will bill you directly instead.
*Offer good in the U.S. only for new subscribers.
I agree to the terms above
Outside the US, click here.
Renewing subscribers, click here.
Gift subscriptions, click here.

NEED HELP? Call 800-951-6397, Monday-Friday (except holidays), 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. ET, or send email to customerservice@worldmag.com.

 

For all other archived issues   

 WORLD 5 YEARS AGO

World Magazine: Nov 28, 1992

Back to basics
Nov. 28, 1992