Daily Dispatches
NATO and Afghan security forces in Kabul, Afghanistan
Associated Press/Photo by Rahmat Gul
NATO and Afghan security forces in Kabul, Afghanistan

An expert weighs in on where the war on terror went wrong


Angelo Codevilla is not a household name, unless you’re a student of international affairs and military history. In that world, he's a certified rock star. Born in Italy in 1943, he immigrated to the United States as a child. He became a U.S. citizen and eventually earned a Ph.D. and began an academic career. In 1977, he joined the U.S. foreign service and quickly moved to Capitol Hill, where he served on the staff of the Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence.

He was instrumental in the development of President Ronald Reagan’s signature program, the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), which was derided by its detractors as a fantasy, but many historians believe it helped to bring an end to the nuclear arms race the United States had been waging with the Soviet Union for more than 40 years.

Codevilla has written more than a dozen books on national defense and statesmanship, some of which are considered classics in their field. I talked with Codevilla about his latest book, To Make and Keep Peace Among Ourselves and with All Nations.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Can you explain your assertion early in your new book: that “to make and keep peace” is the chief end of statesmanship?

It is the end of statesmanship, just as the end of plowing a field is not the plowing itself, but rather the crops that you get out of the field. You don’t deal with other nations in order just to do the dealing. You deal with them in order to keep yourself out of trouble with them, to have as little trouble with them as possible, and to be able to pursue your life at home as best you can. You don’t want to do things to them or with them, except insofar as is necessary for you to live your life as you want at home. …

History shows that one of the worst things you can do for your own domestic peace is to have long-term wars that don’t end very quickly. Such wars tend to foster strife at home. War abroad is not only deadly in its own sense, but it’s also hard on your domestic strife.

What’s the genesis of full title of To Keep and Make Peace Among Ourselves and All Nations? Those are the words that are the end of Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural, the words that are carved in his memorial. Lincoln spoke those words precisely because war at home was just coming to an end, and it had been a terrible thing, and he wanted to reaffirm that the purpose of statesmanship is precisely to have peace above all at home.

In your book, you often qualify the use of the word “peace.” You say “peace that is consistent with the American character,” or sometimes “peace that is according to our definition of peace, and not someone else's definition of peace imposed upon us.” That, of course, is what wars are all about: between contrasting visions of peace. [It’s] a given of human life that there will be conflicting interests, conflicting desires. Sometimes those desires can only be resolved by violence, and the end of that violence is according to someone’s will and against that of the others. It is a question of whose peace will prevail. … Now, as regards peace and the American character, we want not just to have a country, but a country of a certain kind. We always have to keep in mind what kind of peace we want, what kind of people we want to be, and what are we willing to fight for.

What would be your solution to the current wars that we are waging in Iraq and Afghanistan? We have begun to fight these wars without first figuring out who it is that is the problem, whose elimination would give us the peace we want. Right after 9/11, the CIA and the Bush administration following it decided that somehow this thing called al-Qaeda, a bunch of Arabs in Afghanistan, were the problem. So we set out to attack them and people like them.We have basically … either killed or imprisoned all of them, including Osama bin Laden, and it has made no difference. It has not improved our situation, simply because these people were not the problem. The problem was that the powers in places like the Palestinian authority, Iraq, and above all, Saudi Arabia and the [Persian] Gulf, these people were fermenting and are fermenting anti-Americanism. They are mobilizing the entire Muslim world against us. If we wanted to stop this, we would face the rulers of these places with their responsibility, and simply make clear to them that if they did not police their counties, we would go after them. We would not simply put drones on a whole bunch of terrorist foot soldiers. We would go after the leaders of the countries because we cannot police those countries. They are the only ones who can police those countries.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Life with Lyme

    For long-term Lyme patients, treatment is a matter of…


    Job-seeker friendly

    Southern California churches reach the unemployed through job fairs