Virtual Voices
Palestinian youths run from Israeli security forces near the West Bank village of Deir al-Asal.
Associated Press/Hazem Bader/AFP/Getty Images
Palestinian youths run from Israeli security forces near the West Bank village of Deir al-Asal.

Don't fence me in

Israel

At last, an Obama administration official has come out in favor of a fence. He promises it will bring security to people on both sides of the border.

Philip Gordon, National Security Council coordinator for the Middle East, North Africa, and the Gulf, was not speaking of a border fence between the United States and Mexico, but a fence between the West Bank and the 1967 Israeli border. That fence, he said, would be built after Israel relinquishes the territory in exchange for an empty promise of “peace” with the Palestinians.

Apparently Gordon hasn’t noticed that missiles fly over fences. If anyone needs more proof that the land-for-peace formula was stillborn when first proposed, Gaza is the latest example. Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from Gaza in 2005 ensured Hamas would establish a terrorist base from which it now fires missiles indiscriminately at Israeli cities.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Perhaps the most laughable part of Gordon’s speech to the Ha’aretz Israel Conference for Peace was this line: “Israel should not take for granted the opportunity to negotiate that peace with [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas, who has shown time and again that he is committed to nonviolence and coexistence with Israel.”

Not really. Among the region’s great fictions is that Abbas is more moderate than Hamas and other militants. He may occasionally talk that way for Western consumption, but his intentions and words to his own people prove otherwise.

Last week in a Facebook posting, as reported by Palestinian Media Watch, an Israeli research institute that studies Palestinian society, Ofir Gendelman the spokesman to the Arab media in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, asked Abbas in Arabic if he saw reconciliation with Hamas as a means to fight Israel. Gendelman’s post included a cartoon of Hamas and Fatah fighters smiling, shaking hands, and aiming rifles at an Israeli soldier. “To his question about uniting to fight Israel,” writes PMW, “Fatah posted its answer” ‘Yes, this is what we want.’” This is consistent with many other statements and also with what is being taught in Palestinian schools and carried by Palestinian media, which is controlled by Fatah, including the “joys” of martyrdom.

Palestinian leaders have no intention of agreeing to the Western “two-state” peace plan. A recent poll commissioned by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy found that 60 percent of Palestinian Arabs living in the West Bank and Gaza have a “five-year national goal” of “reclaiming all of historic Palestine from the [Jordan] river to the [Mediterranean] sea.”

Past talk of a “greater Israel” with biblical boundaries from the Nile Valley to the Euphrates River has been denounced as genocidal, not to mention fantastical. But when Palestinian Arabs make “historic” claims to expansive borders for a state of their own, replacing Israel, there is silence.

Gordon repeated the oft-heard statement that the United States is “Israel’s greatest defender and closest friend,” but friends don’t ask friends to commit suicide, which is precisely what the false doctrine of moral equivalency would bring to the Jewish state.

Israel’s self-defense actions in Gaza are more than justified. Calls for an immediate cease-fire will only allow the terrorists to rearm with even more deadly and sophisticated weapons that could overcome Israel’s Iron Dome defense system.

While the world is pre-occupied with “civilian” deaths in Gaza (rockets are deliberately launched in areas inhabited by “civilians,” who are used as human shields), few seem concerned about Israeli casualties, now or in past terrorist attacks.

Polls show sympathies shifting in favor of Israel. Hamas may have made a tactical and political mistake in its latest assault on Israel, allowing those who can be persuaded to understand their true intentions.

Listen to a Cal Thomas column on this topic from The World and Everything in It:

© 2014 Tribune Content Agency LLC.

Cal Thomas
Cal Thomas

Cal, whose syndicated column appears on WORLD's website and in more than 500 newspapers, is a frequent contributor to WORLD's radio news magazine The World and Everything in It. Follow Cal on Twitter @CalThomas.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    House divided

    An American couple faces Qatari imprisonment over a tragedy…

    Advertisement