Lead Stories
Lois Lerner at her hearing in May 2013.
Associated Press/Photo by J. Scott Applewhite
Lois Lerner at her hearing in May 2013.

House votes to hold Lois Lerner in contempt

IRS Scandal | Republicans look to force the former IRS official to account for her actions against conservative groups

WASHINGTON—Arguing that the American people deserve answers on the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative groups, House Republicans on Wednesday night voted to hold a former senior IRS manager in contempt of Congress for refusing to testify at two hearings about the scandal.

Six Democrats joined all voting House Republicans in the 231 to 187 vote to hold Lois Lerner in contempt. Lerner, the former director of the division within the IRS that processes tax-exempt applications, twice invoked her Fifth Amendment right to not incriminate herself at House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearings. But Republicans claim Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment right when she offered a statement declaring her innocence before refusing to answer questions.

The House also approved on Wednesday a nonbinding resolution instructing the Justice Department to appoint a special counsel to investigate the IRS.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

House Speaker John Boehner said the House actions put the Obama administration on notice that congressional Republicans will not tolerate stonewalling over the IRS scandal.

“Who’s been fired over the targeting of conservative groups by the IRS?” Boehner asked before Wednesday’s vote. “No one that I’m aware of. Who’s gone to jail for violating the law? When is the administration going to tell the American people the truth?”

The contempt vote came nearly one year after Lerner first disclosed publicly that the IRS had improperly subjected the tax-exempt applications of conservative groups, including pro-life and tea party organizations, to burdensome examinations. In responding to a planted question at an American Bar Association meeting on May 10, 2013, Lerner admitted to and apologized for the targeting scheme. Republicans are trying to uncover any smoking guns that may tie the Obama White House to the IRS’s extra scrutiny as an effort to handicap conservative groups ahead of the 2012 election.

The contempt vote sends the claim to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ronald Machen, who was appointed to that position by President Barack Obama. Republicans and Democrats differ over whether the law requires Machen to bring the issue before a grand jury. It is unclear how the Justice Department will proceed, but it did not move forward on the last contempt of Congress resolution that passed in the House, one that was issued for Attorney General Eric Holder in 2012.

Rep. Tom Price, R-Ga., called the contempt vote against Lerner unfortunate but necessary.

“She is at the center of the repeated and systemic harassment of conservative organizations and individuals by the Internal Revenue Service,” he said. “Had Ms. Lerner cooperated with our constitutional oversight responsibility on behalf of the American people, we would not have been forced to take this action.”

Lerner could face up to one year in prison and a maximum $100,000 fine. Republicans hope that the criminal justice system will compel Lerner to account for her actions. But Democrats like Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts denounced the vote as a “witch hunt” during an election year.

Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, before which Lerner refused to testify, said he is not defending her.

“I wanted to hear from her,” Cummings said on the House floor. “I have questions about why she was unaware of the inappropriate criteria for more than a year after they were created. I want to know why she did not mention the inappropriate criteria in her letters to Congress. But I cannot vote to violate an individual’s Fifth Amendment rights just because I want to hear what she has to say.”

But Jay Sekulow, the chief counsel for The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), said Lerner should be held accountable for deceiving both Congress and the American people. Lerner, Sekulow argued, tried to downplay the extent of the problem and attempted to blame the scheme on a few rogue employees out of a single IRS office.

“In the past year, we have learned that Lerner and others … employed a strategy to delay these applications—effectively silencing these conservative organizations—putting them on the sideline in the run-up to the 2012 presidential election,” Sekulow said.

The ACLJ is representing 41 organizations in 22 states in a federal lawsuit against the IRS. Of the 41 groups, according to the ACLJ, 24 organizations received tax-exempt status after lengthy delays, 11 are still pending, five withdrew applications because of frustration with the IRS process, and one had its file closed by the IRS after refusing to answer the unconstitutional requests for more information.

“What happened at the IRS is a real tragedy,” Sekulow said. “Blatant targeting of Americans because of their political views. Sidestepping the Constitution. And, violating the trust of the American people.”


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…