Virtual Voices
U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington
Associated Press/Photo by J. Scott Applewhite (file)
U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington

How the Supreme Court ‘evolved’ on capital punishment

Death Penalty

Editor’s note: Marvin Olasky’s cover story in the current issue of WORLD magazine focuses on what the Bible says about the death penalty and what life is like on death row. In a series of 10 columns here on wng.org (posted Oct. 7–18), Marvin addresses public policy issues involving deterrence, discrimination, and arbitrariness in capital punishment.

Wilkerson v. Utah (1878): No drawing and quartering, disemboweling, or burning at the stake, for all those are “cruel and unusual punishments” prohibited by the Constitution’s Eighth Amendment.

Furman v. Georgia (1972): The Supreme Court struck down the imposition of capital punishment in several specific instances, but had no majority rationale for doing so. Justices William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall called the death penalty “cruel and unusual,” since it wasn’t used very often. (Brennan defined “cruel and unusual” as “degrading to human dignity … obviously inflicted in wholly arbitrary fashion … clearly and totally rejected throughout society … patently unnecessary.”) Justice William O. Douglas cited racial discrimination. Justices Byron White and Potter Stewart expressed concern about inconsistent application of the law.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Gregg v. Georgia (1976): Many observers thought Furman meant the end of capital punishment in the United States—but seven months later the court created in Roe v. Wade a right of mothers to choose a death penalty for their unborn children. State legislatures that tolerated Roe did not tolerate Furman: 37 states enacted new death penalty statutes that dealt with the inconsistencies that bothered White and Stewart. In Gregg, the court upheld separating trials for capital crimes into two parts, one to decide guilt and the second for sentencing, with juries in the sentencing hearing deciding whether mitigating factors made appropriate a sentence of life in prison rather than execution.

Coker v. Georgia (1977): The court barred use of capital punishment in rape cases (and implied that it could not be the penalty for any state crime other than murder). The federal government remained free to use it as punishment for espionage or treason.

Atkins v. Virginia (2002) and Roper v. Simmons (2005): No capital punishment of the mentally retarded and of persons under 18 at the time of the crime.

Listen to Marvin Olasky discuss his cover story on the death penalty on The World and Everything in It:

Marvin Olasky
Marvin Olasky

Marvin is editor in chief of WORLD News Group and the author of more than 20 books, including The Tragedy of American Compassion. Follow Marvin on Twitter @MarvinOlasky.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    House divided

    An American couple faces Qatari imprisonment over a tragedy…

     

    Birdman

    Some superhero movies are like icing-laden cupcakes, all cloying eye…

    Advertisement