Daily Dispatches
Missouri state Rep. Paul Wieland
Photo via YouTube
Missouri state Rep. Paul Wieland

Contraceptive mandate gets personal for Missouri couple

Religious Liberty

A Missouri couple filed suit against the Obamacare contraceptive mandate on Wednesday, claiming the requirement to pay for contraceptives and abortifacient drugs through their health insurance plan violates their religious beliefs.

While the Obama administration already faces dozens of legal challenges to the mandate from religious organizations, schools, and businesses, this case focuses on the effect the new healthcare law has on individuals.

Paul Wieland, a Missouri state representative, and his wife, Teresa, claim the mandate violates their religious liberty, free speech, and parental rights by forcing them to choose between canceling healthcare coverage for their three daughters or paying for drugs and services they object to on moral grounds.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

The Wielands are Catholic and previously requested a health insurance plan through the Missouri Consolidated Health Care Plan, the provider for state employees, that did not include coverage for contraceptives, abortifacient drugs, or sterilization services. But after Congress passed the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, the state insurer informed the family it would have to participate in a plan that covered the drugs. If they chose not to participate in the employee health plan, the Wielands would have to pay much more, if they could get coverage at all.

“The government forcing the plaintiffs to pay money for the privilege of practicing their religion or controlling their own speech is un-American, unprecedented, and flagrantly unconstitutional,” the complaint states. “The mandate also unconstitutionally interferes with Plaintiffs’ parental rights and fundamental right to family integrity.”

The complaint, filed by the Thomas More Society in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, claims the government has no right to deny the Wielands an exemption from the new healthcare law since it has provided so many other exceptions for compliance. Only businesses with 50 or more employees are required to provide insurance to their workers. Older insurance plans that don’t provide contraceptive coverage have been grandfathered in. And churches are exempt from the contraceptive mandate.

The Wielands also object to contributing to coverage of contraceptive and abortifacient drugs for others and being compelled to refer to the drugs as “preventative care.”

So far, more than 200 plaintiffs have filed 67 lawsuits against the contraceptive mandate. The cases are pending in courts all across the country and are expected to end up before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Leigh Jones
Leigh Jones

Leigh lives in Atlanta and is the managing editor of WORLD's website.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Bug control

    White House stops funding for research that makes viruses…

     

    Darwin made me do it

    Despite obvious facts and contradictions, evolutionary psychologists say nearly every…

    Advertisement