Lead Stories
President Barack Obama
Associated Press/Photo by Evan Vucci
President Barack Obama

Privacy vs. security

National Security | Lawmakers are divided on phone records sweep

A bipartisan group of congressional lawmakers, including several conservative Republicans, are asking agencies in the Obama administration for more information about this week’s revelations that the government is tracking the telephone records of tens of millions of Americans.

“We are concerned that the FBI and NSA are using a statute written primarily to target foreign intelligence to sweep up volumes of data about Americans’ everyday telephone calls,” states the letter signed by 21 lawmakers and sent to Robert Mueller, director of the FBI, and Keith Alexander, the head of the National Security Agency. “Such an intentionally general and suspicionless collection of citizen’s private data is troubling, to say the least.”

The letter highlights the congressional divide over a secret program that gathered records of the telephone numbers, time and duration of millions of calls made inside the U.S. It is a division that is not dictated by political parties.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., said the revelations, made this week in a leak, should “shock anyone who has even a passing interest in privacy, civil liberties, or the Constitution.” Rep. Steve Pearce, R- N.M., said the seizure of the phone records of millions of Americans is a “gross misuse and abuse” of the PATRIOT Act. The law was passed after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to give the government broad new powers in fighting terrorism.

“That the very act designed to protect our nation’s way of life is being used to violate the constitutional rights of all Americans is reprehensible,” Pearce said. “The federal government must be held accountable for its actions.”

But senators from both parties had a more muted response to the practice after a Thursday Senate briefing with top officials from the FBI and NSA.

“It is lawful,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “The records can only be accessed under heightened standards … and it’s to ferret this out before it happens. It’s called protecting America.”

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., the top Republican on the Intelligence Committee, also stood up for the program, saying the agencies do not collect recordings of the content of the calls.

“This is nothing new,” Chambliss said. “This has been going on for seven years … to my knowledge, there has not been any citizen who has registered a complaint. It has proved meritorious because we have gathered significant information on bad guys, but only on bad guys, over the years.”

Not every Senator was impressed with giving this much power and discretion to a federal executive branch that currently is embroiled in numerous scandals centering on the abuse of private information.

“After revelations that the Internal Revenue Service targeted political dissidents and the Department of Justice seized reporters’ phone records, it would appear that this administration has now sunk to a new low,” said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. “The Bill of Rights was designed to protect us from evil, too, particularly that which always correlates with concentrated government power, and particularly executive power.”

In addition to collecting phone records through Verizon, the federal government also has spent years gathering information secretly on Internet usage through Google and other providers. President Barack Obama on Friday backed the surveillance activities in his first public remarks since information on the secret programs was leaked this week.

In a 15-minute defense, Obama said, “nobody is listening to your telephone calls.” He argued that striking the balance between national security interests and individual privacy rights requires “some tradeoffs” and “modest encroachments.” Obama stated that he assessed the programs and concluded that they help prevent terrorist attacks.

“You can’t have 100 percent security and also then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience,” Obama said. “We’re going to have to make some choices as a society.”

The president stated numerous times that congressional lawmakers from both parties authorized the surveillance programs and have been consistently briefed on their progress.

“It’s important to understand that your duly elected representatives have been consistently informed on exactly what we’re doing,” Obama said. “Now, the programs … are secret in the sense that they’re classified. But they’re not secret in the sense that when it comes to telephone calls, every member of Congress has been briefed on this program.”

But some lawmakers doubt that every member of Congress has been briefed, suggesting that just congressional leaders and members of key intelligence committees are being kept informed.

“While some members of Congress were made aware of and approved of this secret, blanket, domestic surveillance program, I was never briefed on it and never approved it,” said Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan. “The use of this indiscriminate practice of seizing the private telephone records of U.S. citizens on U.S. soil without probable cause infringes upon the fundamental constitutional rights of tens of millions of unsuspecting, law-abiding Americans.”


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…