Daily Dispatches
President Barack Obama, accompanied by acting Budget Director Jeffrey Zients, speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House.
Associated Press/Photo by Susan Walsh
President Barack Obama, accompanied by acting Budget Director Jeffrey Zients, speaks in the Rose Garden of the White House.

Obama budget cuts abstinence education funds


In the budget he delivered yesterday to Capitol Hill, President Barack Obama axed funds for sexual risk avoidance (SRA) education, even though research shows these programs can help curb the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.

The president also redirected funds away from avoidance education and towards sex-ed programs that emphasize contraception. In a statement, the National Abstinence Education Association (NAEA) said moving the money violates a 2010 congressional mandate to give states $50 million in Title V grants for SRA education.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

“Using Title V funds for programs that are not compliant with the Congressional definition for abstinence education is a violation of congressional intent and therefore, outside the authority of this budgetary directive,” the group said.

Currently, the ratio of federal funding for contraceptive-based sex education and abstinence-based programs is 16:1, respectively. Opponents of abstinence education criticize it as unrealistic and ineffective, assuming teens will choose to be sexually active. Consequently, they advocate for “safe sex” education instead.

But SRA programs teach students more than just the wisdom of abstinence. They also learn other practical skills, like how to identify healthy relationships, avoid unwanted sexual advances, avoid STDs, and understand contraception. 

“Students in successful SRA programs are more likely to delay sex than their peers, and if they are sexually active, have fewer partners and are no less likely to use a condom,” the NAEA statement said.

And studies show teens aren’t opposed to abstinence. A report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that the number of girls having sex between the ages of 15 and 19 decreased by 8 percent between 1988 and 2010, from 51 percent to 43 percent. The number of boys having sex dropped 18 percent, from 60 percent to 42 percent.

“The president’s move to eliminate sexual risk avoidance (SRA) abstinence programs is completely out of touch with … what is in the best interest of America’s youth,” said NAEA President Valerie Huber. “It’s troubling that the President would want to prevent students from receiving the encouragement and skills to avoid sexual risk.”

Since the president delivered his budget more than two months late, it isn’t clear how significantly it will affect the legislative process.

Tiffany Owens
Tiffany Owens

Tiffany is a correspondent for WORLD News Group.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Powers separated

    Appeals Court rules Obama’s unilateral immigration orders cannot proceed


    Never everland

    Tomorrowland feels good, but its philosophy is hollow


    Suicidal tendencies

    Some now advocate physician-assisted suicide for those without terminal…


    Quake alerts

    Researchers say groups of smartphones may be able to…