Lead Stories
Associated Press/Photo by Gregory Bull

Policy repealed

Military | President Obama certifies the end of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' allowing homosexuals to serve openly

WASHINGTON-President Barack Obama and top military officials late Friday afternoon certified the repeal of the long-standing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. The long-expected certification means Obama and his military team believe that military readiness would not be harmed by ending the 18-year-old ban on homosexuals serving openly in the armed forces.

"As commander in chief, I have always been confident that our dedicated men and women in uniform would transition to a new policy in an orderly manner that preserves unit cohesion, recruitment, retention, and military effectiveness," the president said in a statement.

The decision to certify the repeal, which takes effect in 60 days, was made by Obama, new Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Adm. Mike Mullen. The move represents the final step in what has been a long push by the Obama administration and congressional Democrats to end the policy put in place by Congress and President Bill Clinton in 1993.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

The end of the policy on Sept. 20 will likely give Obama a boost from his liberal supporters heading into the November 2012 election. Many gay activists have been disappointed that Obama and his team have not moved fast enough on issues important to them such as same-sex marriage.

But conservatives are worried that this action will come at the expense of the military and threaten traditional marriage.

"America's military has barred homosexual conduct in the ranks ever since George Washington's Continental Army," said Family Research Council President Tony Perkins. "President Obama, Secretary Panetta, and Adm. Mullen have no basis-other than liberal political correctness-for 'certifying' that a reversal of this longstanding policy would do no harm."

Many conservatives are questioning the timing of the Friday afternoon announcement for certifying such a seismic change. Lawmakers have long used that time frame as a dumping ground for bad or controversial news that would likely get little attention as Americans head into their weekends.

Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, said Obama now "owns" the new military this repeal will create.

"History will hold accountable President Obama, members of the previous lame-duck Congress, and gay activists who misused the federal courts in order to impose . . . policies that will undermine morale and readiness in the all-volunteer force," Donnelly said in a statement.

After years of unsuccessful attempts by liberals to kill the policy, the now successful effort began last year soon after voters put the House back in Republican hands in November's elections. But before the new, more conservative Congress began work in January, Democrats controlling Congress, sensing this could be their last chance for several years, mounted a final drive to end the policy last December.

As the legislative calendar drew to a close, the tightly divided Senate held a Saturday vote on Dec. 18 to strike down the ban. Eight Republicans joined the Democrats in the 65-to-31 vote.

A 2010 Pentagon review that cited a low risk to military effectiveness in the aftermath of any repeal gave cover to many lawmakers who voted to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

But a 30-page Defense Department document completed in April revealed that members of Congress were deceived by some officials attached to the Pentagon report who wanted "to gain momentum in support of a legislative change during the 'lame duck' session of Congress following the Nov. 2, 2010, elections."

This April review by the Defense Department's inspector general concluded that someone possessing "a strongly emotional attachment to the issue" and "likely a pro-repeal agenda" broke security rules and leaked misleading selections of the data to the media.

On Nov. 11, 2010, about a month before the final vote in Congress, The Washington Post published a story, which was cited on the Senate floor during debates, saying that 70 percent of active-duty and reserve troops surveyed were not worried about a repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

But that number was misleading at best: The 70 percent was inflated because it combined four answers to the survey: very positively, positively, mixed, and no effect.

"If sources had desired to further an anti-repeal bias for the article," the military concluded in its April report on the leak, "he/she could likewise have combined four results categories from that same survey question to conclude that 82 percent of respondents said the effect of repealing the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy would be negative, mixed or no effect."

An even closer examination of the original 256-page policy review published last year reveals that only 9.4 percent of respondents said the change would have a mostly positive effect on a unit's combat performance.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Life with Lyme

    For long-term Lyme patients, treatment is a matter of…