Leonard Ortiz/The Orange County Register/Zuma/Newscom

They know where you work

Marriage | The same-sex marriage lobby is now going after organizations that have employees and clients who support traditional marriage

Issue: "Tour d'America," June 18, 2011

Peter Vidmar seemed like the perfect choice to serve as the Chief of Mission for next year's Olympics in London. A corporate motivational speaker and former Olympic champion, Vidmar since 2008 has been chairman of USA Gymnastics. Yet while he was offered and accepted the post, come summer 2012, Vidmar will not be the United States Chief of Mission. Why? Because in 2008 he donated $2,000 to support California's Proposition 8, the voter-approved legislation that defines marriage as between one man and one woman.

Vidmar's case was a controversy that more sputtered than erupted. On April 29, the U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) announced that it had selected Vidmar as Chief of Mission. Over the following few days a handful of gay websites complained, citing Vidmar's background as an advocate for traditional marriage and his membership in the Mormon church. Then on May 5 the Chicago Tribune posted an item on its sports blog, Globetrotting, in which only one athlete, figure skater Johnny Weir, said he opposed Vidmar's appointment. In the same article Vidmar assured columnist Philip Hersch he would serve and support all the Olympians regardless of their sexual orientation, and the CEO of the USOC, Scott Blackmun, reaffirmed the committee's choice, saying the USOC respected Vidmar's right to express his religious convictions.

The next day, on May 6, Vidmar announced he was resigning so his presence would not become a distraction to the upcoming games and the performances of the athletes.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Others have reacted differently to gay protests. When University of Michigan law students opposed Republican Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio as this year's commencement speaker on the grounds that he "vocally and actively supports denying equal rights to gays and lesbians," the university held firm. Except for a group of students staging a silent walkout, Portman's graduation speech came off without a hitch.

Likewise, some University of South Carolina students objected to the honorary degree their school was conferring on the president of the Southern Baptist Convention, G. Bryant Wright, and called him an "advocate for hate." Wright attended the ceremony, collected his diploma, and the event went on. But Portman and Wright do not have to depend on corporate invitations for their daily bread. We'll watch to see what happens to Vidmar's bookings and career, now that he is on the radar of gay-rights groups.

Recent events surrounding law firm King and Spalding's decision to renege on its contract to defend the Defense of Marriage Act and drop the United States House of Representatives as a client suggest that Vidmar might have a hard time.

One day after King and Spalding withdrew from the case, The Weekly Standard obtained an internal email from the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgendered (LGBT) activist group that lobbies for same-sex marriage. The email revealed that the organization privately contacted King and Spalding clients to inform them of the firm's "wrongheaded decision" to represent the House.

Unapologetic, HRC spokesman Fred Sainz confirmed to The Washington Post that the group did indeed contact some of King and Spalding's Fortune 500 clientele so they could, in turn, bring pressure to bear against the Atlanta-based firm. Though Sainz would not disclose which clients his group contacted, he did say, "We are an advocacy firm that is dedicated to improving the lives of gays and lesbians. It is incumbent on us to launch a full-throated educational campaign so firms know that these kinds of engagements will reflect on the way [their] clients and law school recruits think of [them]," adding, "We did all of this, and we're proud to have done it."

Maggie Gallagher, president of the National Organization for Marriage, says this kind of professional intimidation is the same-sex lobby's new modus operandi for furthering its agenda. "Rather than try to win over voters, they threaten to hurt your business and go to clients and cause a fuss. This isn't confirmed yet, but according to the gay blogs, they succeeded in getting Coca-Cola to pressure King and Spalding," she says. To date, the soft drink giant will neither confirm nor deny that it threatened to take its legal business elsewhere if the firm did not drop DOMA, but a Coca-Cola spokesman did point out that the company has a long history of support for "diversity."

Great as the legal implications of the HRC getting a major law firm to drop a case it finds objectionable are, perhaps even more significant is the case of Scott Eckern, former artistic director and chief operating officer of Sacramento's California Music Theatre. After some gay theater professionals noticed his name on the website antigayblacklist.com that listed people who contributed money to support Proposition 8, they organized a boycott.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…