Features
Illustration by Krieg Barrie

Dear Sen. Landrieu

Politics | An open letter to Louisiana's Honorable Mary Landrieu

Issue: "2009 Daniel of the Year," Dec. 19, 2009


Honorable Mary Landrieu
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
December 19, 2009
Dear Sen. Landrieu:

On behalf of Capitol Hill reporters weary from inexhaustible healthcare debates that have consumed two recent Saturdays, I'd like to apologize for initial published reports that you had secured only $100 million in federal funds for Louisiana in exchange for your support. I am not trying to be defensive, but in the midst of debates over trillion-dollar healthcare fixes, sometimes the numbers begin to blur.

Thanks for giving a speech on the Senate floor to set the record straight. When you declared, "I am not going to be defensive about asking for help in this situation. It is not a $100 million fix, it is a nearly $300 million fix," you made our job easier: No wonder you cast one of the 60 votes needed to keep alive Majority Leader Harry Reid's 2,074-page bill.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

In designating that amount, the bill writers went to great lengths-two pages worth-to bury your deal, avoiding the word "Louisiana" by describing in detail a place that could be identified as your state only by above-average geography students ("certain state recovering from a major disaster," etc.). Now you cleared that up for the rest of us.

Since you were one of the last Democratic holdouts in what ended as a no-room-for-error, 60-39 margin on the vote to begin the healthcare debate, other wavering moderates are probably wondering where their states' funds are. But the pre--Thanksgiving Day vote was just the first of many. Your colleagues should know there is plenty of time to add their own pork to the bill.

As you have already figured out with your $300 million in specially designated Medicaid funds, this bill represents the mother of all legislative leverage opportunities for lawmakers who believe they must uphold the long-standing congressional tradition of bringing home the federal bacon. Clearly Sen. Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and President Barack Obama have invested too much of their own political capital on healthcare reform to allow failure.

Moderate Democrats are understandably a little nervous considering the latest Rasmussen poll showing that more than half of the country opposes the proposed legislation, and only 17 percent believe the CBO projections that the Senate bill will lower the deficit. The moderates will probably come to you for advice on how to pull off voting for healthcare, either boldly declaring their incentives as you have done or having them tucked away in some other bill. It's a good time to remind them of the past dollars grabbed for their states:

Sen. Ben Nelson for Nebraska, who joined you as one of the last three holdouts on the vote, last year secured $866,000 in agriculture appropriations to help with fly control in Lincoln. Political scientist John Hibbing at the University of Nebraska believes that the state would applaud Sen. Nelson if he can secure language in the Senate bill explicitly excluding federal funding of abortion. "But we are a conservative state, suspicious of government intrusion into new areas, " Hibbing hastened to add. "I'm not sure there is anything that will buy Nebraska."

Sen. Byron Dorgan, your colleague from North Dakota, faces a tough 2010 reelection effort in a state that preferred Republican John McCain for president last year. Last year he got $3 million appropriated to the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks to help make NASA satellite images more accessible to the public.

With bipartisanship a 2009 buzzword, you should not forget the two Republican senators most likely to support the final bill: Maine's Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins. This is good news for that state's lobster industry. The pair landed $150,000 for lobster research last year and $100,000 for the state's lobster foundation. Also, Maine produces the majority of the nation's low-bush blueberries, and last year Snowe and Collins got $173,000 in federal cash for blueberry research. Supporting blueberries is a natural fit for a healthcare bill; after all, blueberries are "heart healthy."

Granted your colleagues probably don't need advice on how to win a feeding spot at the federal trough. Congressional lawmakers last year secured 10,160 earmarks worth $19.6 billion. (Just don't tell the CBO about the potential cost of add-ons to the price of healthcare reform.) Since the bill comes with 18 new tax increases totaling $150 billion in new annual federal revenue, it seems fair to reward the states whose senators vote for healthcare overhaul.

Take Arkansas. Blanche Lincoln was the last senator to announce her vote to move forward with the health bill. That state also went for McCain in 2008 and pundits predict Lincoln's seat will go Republican in 2010.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Bug control

    White House stops funding for research that makes viruses…

     

    Darwin made me do it

    Despite obvious facts and contradictions, evolutionary psychologists say nearly every…

    Advertisement