Krugman's fractured fairy tales


My distinguished colleague Paul Krugman has obviously decided to turn all mainstream economics textbook analyses upside down. Starting with a preconceived conclusion, he demonstrates willingness to grab at any odd argument in an effort to justify the policies of waste that have exploded under the current administration. The latest concept that Krugman tries to revolutionize is the "crowding out" effect of government spending---redirecting resources from potential productive private uses to unproductive or destructive public uses.

Krugman's fractured fairy tale begins with an antiquated Keynesian formula: GDP (the largely useless concept of national output) = C (individual consumption) + I (private investment) + G (government purchases). Today's GDP is falling with the fall of C and I while "monetary policy---the usual line of defense against recession---is hard up against the zero-interest-rate bound." Thus the solution becomes self-evident.

Enters the Colossus: Big Government promises to revive the economy by increasing its purchases---as much as is necessary to bring the nation's output to its full employment level. Krugman starts with a truism derived from the above formula (higher G means higher GDP, if we keep C and I unchanged) and the correct observation that expectations are a more important determinant in private investment than interest rates. Unfortunately, he then jumps to the naïve conclusion that, just by boosting the GDP figure, the current fiscal expansion will create enough business and consumer confidence to produce the next economic boom.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

But here is the catch---what we produce and how we produce it is just as, if not more, important than how much we produce. If we believe that the government is able to utilize our resources through planning better than we do it through the market, it is theoretically possible for Obama's stimulus to also increase private spending and investment---a veritable "crowding in" effect. In which case Krugman deserves a second Nobel Prize in economics. If, on the other hand, most of us are not blind to the abysmal record of government mismanagement of the economy during the last century, the current policy can only stimulate uncertainty, inflation, and another round of market collapses.

Alex Tokarev
Alex Tokarev

Alex is the chair of the Department of Business at Morthland College in West Frankfort, Ill., and teaches at Northwood University in Midland, Mich. The native of communist Bulgaria fanatically supports the Bulgarian soccer team, Levski.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Life with Lyme

    For long-term Lyme patients, treatment is a matter of…