James Allen Walker for WORLD

Shrinking discussion

Q&A | One gutsy psychiatrist has spoken out about homosexuality, but social and professional pressure has silenced others

Issue: "New faces of New Orleans," Aug. 15, 2009

Over the years I've interviewed extraordinary individuals ranging from Newt Gingrich to Michael Jordan, but none matches Jeffrey Satinover in his range of intellectual attainments. Satinover was a National Merit Scholar as an MIT undergraduate and subsequently attained master's degrees at Harvard and Yale and a medical degree at the University of Texas. He practiced as a psychoanalyst and psychiatrist from 1976 to 2003. Last year, at age 61, he received a degree in physics (summa cum laude) from the University of Nice in France.

But Satinover also has an unusual attribute among intellectuals: courage. In 1996 he came out with Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth, which argued against the contemporary theory that homosexuality is innate and, in a sense, predestined. It's probably the best book on the subject, and it brought vicious attacks from the gay lobby. Even the Amazon.com website includes 70 customer reviews, with 33 readers giving it a five-star highest rating, 25 giving it a one-star lowest rating, and only 12 in the middle.

Positive reviews emphasize the book's careful research; hostiles complain, "Books such as these continue the myth that homosexuality is wrong-it is sad to think some people still believe this nonsense." Satinover, not backing down, has written amicus briefs on the question for Supreme Court cases. He also does physics research for a Swiss institute and teaches statistics.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Q: Did you enjoy your years as a very busy psychiatrist?

I was always very curious and determined to pursue things that interested me. . . . If you are dealing with the question of homosexuality, particularly from the point of view of considering whether it's a changeable condition, then your life as a psychiatrist is guaranteed to be extremely interesting. It may not be comfortable, but you definitely won't be bored.

Q: As your life became interesting, did you develop a fan club?

I developed two clubs, the fan club and the club that wanted to club me to death.

Q: And at some point you became a public figure?

It was a slow process as I began to speak. I didn't just begin to develop a point of view about homosexuality and began to treat it as a reversible condition, but I also became upset at the bamboozlement about this whole topic that was prevalent in the mental health professions, and the propagation of a point of view that is at the very least debatable if not outright mistaken. I met so many remarkable individuals and discovered that homosexuality is not an easy thing to change. It goes to the very heart of one's relationships and becomes a completely dominant feature of one's life.

Q: Does homosexuality have to become the central identity?

Not everybody does that, but sexuality is the most important emotional bond that human beings have. Whenever that relationship becomes difficult, painful, disturbed, or altered, it's a source of enormous suffering. That's equally true for any heterosexual relationship. We need it, we crave it so much, and anything that is an obstacle becomes incredibly important. For those wrestling with homosexuality-that is, they feel a division between where their desires are leading them and what they most deeply want out of life-dealing with that successfully requires penetrating deeply into the heart of the relationship between men and women. People who do that must be willing to experience the suffering involved in confronting those issues, and often end up having a much deeper appreciation for the heart of human relationships. As a consequence of the price they paid, they are often very impressive human beings.

Q: You wanted to help them?

That they were being so badly mischaracterized by the mental health professions became a source of anger for me. I decided that I would write a book so that people out there struggling, attempting to help people, or dealing with public policy issues would have a resource. That propelled me into the public eye.

Q: How were homosexuals being mischaracterized?

They were told all sorts of things. People attempting to change were told, "You're not making this decision yourself, you're just internalizing the cruel ideas of the society around you," or, "You're a nutcase," "You're damaging society," on and on. There was very little support from that body of professionals that, in theory, ought to be their largest source of support. By the '90s, the dominant theory was that homosexuality was genetic, natural, and unchangeable.

Q: Was this backed up by any thorough research?

It was 95 percent ideology. Often, if I would give public talks on this subject, I would throw up overheads showing public statements of reporters and scientists all saying, "It's genetics, science shows this," etc. Then I would show quotations from the research articles that were being used to support these statements, and the research articles themselves contradicted these statements in the most flatly obvious way. Well-known researchers, whose work has been prominently cited as showing the genetic inheritance patterns of homosexuality, say in their own articles that they did the research to demonstrate that homosexuality was genetic. (That's already a problem because scientists aren't supposed to set out with an agenda, but at least they admit it.) And at the end of the articles they say, "We discovered, much to our surprise, that the environmental component is larger." Yet those very articles would be referenced in public policy debates as though they came to the opposite conclusion.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…