Columnists > Mailbag

Mailbag

Letters from our readers

Issue: "Ready or not, here we go," March 28, 2009

Unmistakable irony

In President Obama's stirring inaugural address ("The Obama era," Feb. 14), he predicted "defeat" for "those who seek to advance their aims by . . . slaughtering innocents." Can anyone miss the irony that, three days later, he provided abortionists with taxpayers' money to do this very thing across the globe (The Buzz, Feb. 14)? How sad that Obama's new "age of responsibility" should begin with such a massive act of irresponsibility.
-David Whitla; Indianapolis, Ind.

Phasing in debt

Thank you for the column about Obama's comments on sacrifice ("Phasing out sacrifice," Feb. 14). It's easy to throw out catchy phrases attempting to rally the uninformed masses without having real substantive decreases in government. How does Obama expect to lower taxes (as he promised) and spend more on bailout pork without increasing our national debt?
-Robert Zetocha; Lincoln, Neb.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Joel Belz listed American wars since the end of WWII but omitted the Korean War (1950-53). We lost over 36,000 troops in that "police action" and, much like our current engagements, most folks weren't too concerned unless they had a family member in the Armed Forces. My older brother was awarded a Purple Heart and a Bronze Star. Regarding sacrifices, I was born in 1937 and recall as a 5-year-old a serious shortage of Fleers Double Bubble gum and chocolate bars. There was a thriving black market in the stuff.
-Doug Ferree; Kalispell, Mont.

Real education

I appreciated your interview with Charles Murray ("College crush," Feb. 14). I am aware of alternative ways to get a B.A. without the college experience, but this was the first time I had heard of a feasible means of doing away with the need for one. Murray's proposal for certification exams truly would be a free-market solution.
-Anna Pedersen, 18; Houston, Texas

In light of our troubled economy and the enormous cost of obtaining a college education, certifying individuals would work well in technical fields. However, applied to liberal arts--based occupations, certification would mean that students would bypass general education classes outside their fields of interest. In the classical approach to learning, such classes show students how to understand their world, analyze trends in society, make educated decisions, and communicate those decisions to others.
-Susan Peisker; Cedar Park, Texas

Your interview with Murray is a rare public acknowledgement of a subtle but powerful shift taking place as higher education increasingly becomes focused on outcomes assessment. Accreditation agencies ask, "Are schools delivering what they say?" Employers ask, "What does the student with a degree really know?" But some academic institutions are taking the lead by adopting truly competency-based approaches for granting degrees. Real education calls for real assessment.
-Stephen Kemp; Ames, Iowa

More than class struggle

By using the term born again to include Muslims, Jews, and atheists in his song "Born Again American" ("Patriot games," Feb. 14), Norman Lear strips the phrase of its original meaning and makes it just a euphemism for "spiritually inclined." Jesus meant more than class struggle and social reform when He said, "You must be born again."
-John Harris; Lexington Park, Md.

Kudos to Emily Belz for the timely article regarding Norman Lear and his reshaping of America. His political activism continues America's slide toward becoming a godless nation. A closer examination of the lyrics and philosophy of the performers reveals a subtle attack on the free enterprise system and the faith of the founders of America.
-Terry Blankenship; Dallas, Texas

The Problem of Edmund

Thank you for a beautiful and thought-provoking column ("Surprised by Jack," Feb. 14). To those who believe in a "Problem of Susan," I submit the "Problem of Edmund": Someone in league with the White Witch simply could not be "pure enough to deserve" Aslan's ultimate mercy and sacrifice, yet that is exactly what he was given.
-Alyssa Lynne Rosselli, 16; LaPorte, Ind.

Darwin vs. Darwin

Marvin Olasky ("Dialogue with Darwinists," Feb. 14) suggests a debate to discover commonality between pro-evolution geneticist Francis Collins and an Intelligent Design theorist like Michael Behe. One possibility: Evolution neither affirms nor denies the existence of God. The confusion is caused by the juxtaposition of Darwinism as a philosophy with atheistic implications and Darwinism as a science that merely studies a process.
-Steve Aldridge; Prior Lake, Minn.

Until now

Andrée Seu's putting her finger on the herd-instinct aspect of hermeneutics ("Group thinking," Feb. 14) was an epiphany for me. Like the fish in her illustration, I couldn't see the water for the, ah, water-until now!
-Peter Kushkowski; Portland, Conn.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Bug control

    White House stops funding for research that makes viruses…

     

    Darwin made me do it

    Despite obvious facts and contradictions, evolutionary psychologists say nearly every…

    Advertisement