Katie Falkenberg/The Washington Times

Choice revokers

Politics | Democrats work to kill a school voucher program that has helped many of their own constituents

Issue: "Ready or not, here we go," March 28, 2009

WASHINGTON, D.C.-The first and only federal school voucher program, one that serves 1,900 children, is about to die a quiet death at the hands of Congress, despite its enormous popularity.

Under spending legislation Congress just passed, the Washington, D.C., $14 million school voucher program will come to an end after the 2009-10 school year, unless both Congress and the District of Columbia's council reauthorize it. Democrats, the district's council, and the local teachers union have historically opposed the program, which Republicans passed in 2004 with the support of then-D.C. Mayor Anthony Williams. Now with a Democrat-controlled Congress and a president who opposes vouchers, the program is all but certain to end. Some Republicans, who have hoped that a successful program in D.C. could extend elsewhere, see the move as a power play by Democrats.

"They're tied to the teachers unions, they can say all they want that they're looking out for the rights of kids," said Rep. Buck McKeon, R-Calif., who is the top Republican on the House Education Committee. "It's unconscionable."

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

McKeon is stunned that Democrats oppose a program that he believes has helped so many families who vote Democratic in the district. Thousands are on the waiting list to receive the scholarships that have allowed children of low-income families to attend private schools like Sidwell Friends, where the Obama girls attend.

Single mom Verdill Bennett works as a traffic controller at Georgetown University. She has had three children in private schools for the last four years through the voucher program. She votes Democratic and was surprised to hear that many in the party, including her representative, Eleanor Holmes Norton, oppose the program.

"That would be a big mistake to stop this program because it's helping black youth," she told me. "A lot of kids act out because they can't read or write, and they're ashamed to tell somebody." She called the vouchers "a blessing, it's a blessing from God."

Vouchers have tepid advocates in both Michelle Rhee, the chancellor of D.C. schools, and in Mayor Adrian Fenty, who originally opposed the idea before he took office in 2006. Program supporters have called on the mayor to lobby Congress for its preservation.

The program is small-only 4 percent of the District's nearly 50,000 students receive the scholarships. It's more cost-effective than the $13,000-
per-student public-
school system, one of the worst and most expensive in the country. Each student in the voucher program gets $7,500 for tuition, and fewer than half of students in the program use the full scholarship, according to the program's administrators.

Democrats' main argument against vouchers is that they suck resources away from the public-school system, leaving students there worse off. The $14 million voucher program, though, doesn't draw any funding from the budget for public schools, and Congress even sweetened the original legislation for voucher critics by providing more funds to both D.C. public and charter schools.

Though Democratic leaders have recently denied that they want to kill the program, some Democrats admitted earlier their desire to be rid of it. As D.C.'s delegate in Congress, Norton has strongly opposed vouchers and told The Washington Post last summer, "the Democratic Congress is not about to extend this program." Other Democrats WORLD interviewed said they would vote against it as well. The man behind the provision to end the vouchers, Rep. David Obey, D-Wis., chair of the Appropriations Committee, said that children with scholarships to private schools now should be prepared to reenter public schools.

Even the editorial board of the liberal Washington Post wrote at the beginning of March that Democrats were captive to their own political interests and those of the teachers unions in opposing vouchers: "Why else has so much time and effort gone into trying to kill off what, in the grand scheme of government spending, is a tiny program? Why wouldn't Congress want to get the results of a carefully calibrated scientific study before pulling the plug on a program that has proved to be enormously popular? Could the real fear be that school vouchers might actually be shown to be effective in leveling the academic playing field?"

Preliminary studies have shown only modest improvements in test scores for those in the voucher program, though parents have expressed satisfaction. The most recent study to be released in the spring will examine the first three years of the program, which some education experts agree is a short time to determine vouchers' effectiveness.

"If you're a kid coming into a private school from a low-performing school, it may take a few years to catch up and begin to show improvement," said Byron Davis, spokesman for the Washington Scholarship Fund, which runs the program.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Life with Lyme

    For long-term Lyme patients, treatment is a matter of…


    Job-seeker friendly

    Southern California churches reach the unemployed through job fairs