Brad Pitt vs. Joe the Plumber

"Brad Pitt vs. Joe the Plumber" Continued...

Issue: "Obama," Nov. 15, 2008

The Prop 8 campaign was the most expensive in the history of the issue, with the sides spending more than $70 million combined. An examination of fundraising stats revealed Prop 8 as a battle between the grassroots and the elite, said Focus on the Family policy analyst Carrie Gordon Earll. While Hollywood stars and corporate giants wrote five- and six-figure checks, the sheer number of $25 and $50 donations streaming in from Main Street actually crashed the secretary of state's computer.

"It was Brad Pitt versus Joe the Plumber," Earll said.

Going forward, she added, conservatives in the 20 states that have not passed marriage-protection amendments need to wake up to the stakes. "Over the past 10 years, we've seen this issue progress, examples have begun piling up of infringement on parental rights and the ridiculing and harassing of people of faith" who hold to a traditional view of marriage, Earll said. The Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that parents do not have a right to opt out, or even to be notified, when their children will be taught that gay marriage is normal. In Ohio and Georgia over the last year, state and federal authorities have fired workers over their religious views of homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

"People may not be catching the bigger picture that gay marriage is not just about 'rights' for homosexuals, but about parental rights and religious liberties," Earll said. "It's about coming up against a homosexual agenda that insists on marginalizing and silencing those who disagree."

The hallmark feature of the Prop 8 battle was the coalition of religious groups working together, first to get the measure on the ballot, then to pass it. (See "The power of three," WORLD, July 26, 2008.)

Ron Prentice, CEO of the California Family Council, called the effort perhaps the first modern attempt by a coalition of very theologically diverse religious organizations to impact the culture via the vote. That coalition included evangelicals, Greek Orthodox, Roman Catholics, Mormons, and many Christian denominations. The resulting Prop 8 victory "was a very significant and encouraging win," Prentice said. "Our hope is not only to maintain the momentum, but to grow these networks so that we can continue to impact the culture with Judeo-Christian principles."

Ballot measures roundup



Proposition 102: Amend state constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman. Approved


Marriage Protection Amendment: Amend state constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman, and ban same-sex equivalents such as civil unions. Approved


Prop 8: Amend state constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman. Approved



Proposition 4: Require abortionists to notify parents when a minor girl seeks an abortion. Defeated


Question 48: Define "person" as any human being from the moment of fertilization. Defeated


Proposal 2: Allow researchers to use donated fertility clinic embryos to obtain stem cells. Approved

South Dakota

Abortion Ban: Prohibit abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or to protect the mother's health. Defeated



I-1000: Legalize assisted suicides for mentally competent, terminally ill adults with six months or less to live. Approved



Issue 6: Allow construction of Ohio's first casino, to be located near Wilmington. Defeated


Casino Measure: Make Maryland the 38th state to allow slots or casino-style gambling. Approved



Unmarried Couples: Prevent all unmarried couples from adopting or providing foster care to minors. Approved

Affirmative Action


Initiative 424: Amend the state constitution to ban affirmative action. Approved


Civil Rights Initiative: Ban affirmative action programs. Pending



Amendment 1: Make English the official language at all government meetings. Approved


Measure 58: Prohibit public schools from teaching non-English-speaking students in their native language after one year in elementary school, or two years in high school. Defeated

Eminent Domain


Question 1: Restrict government use of eminent domain to acquire private property for public use. Approved

Lynn Vincent
Lynn Vincent

Lynn is a senior writer for WORLD Magazine and the best-selling author of 10 non-fiction books.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Job-seeker friendly

    Southern California churches reach the unemployed through job fairs 


    After a fiery trial

    Intelligent design proponent David Coppedge reflects on his wrongful termination…