Voices > Mailbag

Mailbag

Letters from our readers

Issue: "Signs and wonders," Jan. 26, 2008

Into the light

Thank you very much for your article on Mike Huckabee ("Out from the shadows," Dec. 22). As an avid supporter, for me it was a dream come true to have you do another article on him. It was a well-researched and well-written piece of work. People need to know about Huckabee's views on abortion, prayer in school, immigration, and other issues.
-Reuben Peck, 14,; Leslie, Mich.

You called Huckabee's "Secure America Plan" "compassionate" and reported that it would be fascinating to see if his plan will assuage the "anti-immigration conservatives." I had to look back at the cover to confirm I wasn't reading Time. Conservatives concerned about Huckabee aren't necessarily anti-immigration; we are anti-illegal immigration.
-Bryan T. Begley; Cynthiana, Ky.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

I am ashamed of your coverage of Huckabee, and even more disappointed that you have failed to give more space to Ron Paul. The Republican Party has betrayed us, and it is using us to accomplish its plans.
-Jon Hodges; Acworth, Ga.

Pray more, talk less

I seem wired to have a keen interest in all things political. Therefore Marvin Olasky's column ("Nothing works," Dec. 22) was exactly what I needed. Front and center on my refrigerator now is his comment that "it's important to care about politics and even more important not to care deeply." America's only hope is in God's grace. May I pray more and talk politics less this election year.
-Jacqueline Ekberg; Wray, Colo.

I was very disappointed with Olasky's column. We need to be deeply concerned for those suffering, from babies about to be aborted to women working as sex slaves, and that means caring deeply about the political atmosphere of this country that can bring freedom for the suffering captives.
-Rick Kenyon; Brattleboro, Vt.

The more I have gotten involved in politics, the more I have come to realize that power and politics have no answers for the real problems that plague people. Only God does. We can so easily get invested in seeing "our guy win" that we abandon our first call as believers. We can easily let the day-to-day news and polls wash away our perspective on life and eternity. And we can become chained to a set of bullet-point ideals espoused by secular conservatives, some of which may conflict with our Christian faith.
-Daniel Darling; Round Lake, Ill.

More questions

Thanks to Joel Belz for asking "The right questions" (Dec. 22). "Family values" and "getting the judges right" matter little if we fail to challenge false gospels by preaching and living the truth. Those among us who support Romney should watch out lest political victory be gained at the price of disaster for the truth of our Lord Jesus Christ.
-Jon Holmlund; Carlsbad, Calif.

Romney's claim that Mormonism is a bona fide New Testament Christian religion should be challenged. Most Americans, including most evangelical Christians, are unaware of Mormonism's cultic and heretical beliefs, such as the belief that Jesus was married and fathered children; deceased non-Mormons can be saved by proxy baptism on their behalf by Mormons; and that salvation is by grace coupled with law-keeping and the performance of Mormon rituals.
-Joseph M. Hopkins; New Wilmington, Pa.

My principal concern with Romney is not his personal beliefs, and I don't accept the far-fetched notions that he would attempt to proselytize the nation or be an agent for the Latter Day Saints hierarchy. I do believe, however, that as president he would bring a level of credibility and respectability to the false teachings of Mormonism that would result in many people embracing them.
-Steve Carter; Simpsonville, S.C.

Belz's column reminds me of a passage from Chesterton's Heretics. In it he argues against the common notion that "there is something narrow or irrelevant or even mean about attacking a man's religion, or arguing from it in matters of politics or ethics." The accusation itself is, he wrote, "almost grotesquely narrow." It is not reasonable that "a difference of opinion about the object of taxation matters very much; but a difference of opinion about the object of human existence does not matter at all. . . . This sort of enlightenment is surely about the most unenlightened that it is possible to imagine."
-Greta Krawczyk; Logansport, Ind.

On the religious points Romney's speech ("Romney's problem," Dec. 15) was quite deceptive, and that is the problem. When Romney says he believes in god, it is not the Christian God, and when he says Jesus is the Son of God, he doesn't mean that in the same way Christians do. Can people not see that he is internally conflicted?
-John T. Miller; St. George, Utah

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Attack bac

    Research points to possible way to target superbugs

    Advertisement