Features

'Hard is not hopeless'

Iraq | Before a skeptical Senate committee, Lt. Gen. David Petraeus outlines strategy for taming Islamic violence in Baghdad

Issue: "The surge is on," Feb. 3, 2007

When Lt. Gen. David Petraeus faced a Senate Armed Services committee stacked with anti-war legislators on the first day of confirmation hearings, the three-star general was blunt: "The situation in Iraq is dire. The way ahead will be very hard. But hard is not hopeless."

"Hard is not hopeless" was a chord President Bush struck in his State of the Union address later that evening. "The rite of custom brings us together at a defining hour-when decisions are hard and courage is needed," the president told lawmakers. "This is not the fight we entered in Iraq, but it is the fight we're in. Every one of us wishes this war were over and won. Yet it would not be like us to leave our promises unkept, our friends abandoned, and our own security at risk."

But as a week of war hearings unfolded in the House and Senate, the chord was one many lawmakers greeted with a deaf ear.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Sen. Hillary Clinton appeared on ABC's Good Morning America before heading to Petraeus' hearings on Jan. 23 to criticize the president's plan to send more troops to Iraq. When host Diane Sawyer pointed out that Clinton voted to authorize the war in 2002, the senator responded: "Well, I think giving the president the authority has turned out to be a terrible decision for everybody, including the president."

Later that morning in the Caucus Room of the Russell Senate Building, Clinton and other senators used confirmation hearings for Petraeus, up for the top military command post in Iraq, as an opportunity to sound off against the Bush administration's plan to send an additional 21,500 troops to Iraq.

Across the street in the Dirksen Senate Office Building, members of the Foreign Relations Committee put their objections in writing: The committee approved a non-binding resolution that called the president's plan "not in the national interest" and urged the full Senate to vote on the resolution within a week.

Committee chairman Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) crafted the resolution with Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, the only Republican on the committee to support it. But at least eight other Republicans in the Senate said they backed legislative action to oppose the president's plan as well. Hagel doled out searing criticism of the troop surge, calling Bush's war policy "a ping-pong game with American lives. . . . We better be damn sure we know what we're doing, all of us, before we put 22,000 more Americans into that grinder."

Back in the armed services hearings, Petraeus refused to guarantee success but assured senators he knew what he was doing. Sitting behind a red-draped table in a highly decorated dress uniform, the general also talked about a less-discussed feature of the troop surge: what the troops actually will do.

Petraeus, who co-authored a recent Pentagon manual for battling the insurgency, outlined a strategy for bolstering Baghdad against sectarian violence and giving Iraqi officials "more breathing room." The general said troops will spend more time learning about the sectarian tensions unique to each neighborhood before attempting to secure them. The strategy will require more time and patience, he said, but is the way to move beyond chaos.

Controlling Iraqi chaos is a job with which Petraeus is familiar. The general has served two tours of duty in Iraq, first as commander of the 101st Airborne Division, and then as overseer of the training of Iraqi forces. During his first tour, Petraeus' division largely secured the violent city of Mosul. While on the ground the general also focused on economic development and infrastructure and led his troops in reconstruction and public-works projects. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who supports the president's surge plan, has called Petraeus "General Grant for the Iraq War."

Still, Petraeus, widely respected and considered a shoo-in for confirmation, agreed with senators that the situation in Iraq is intricate and unpredictable: "We face a determined, adaptable, barbaric enemy. . . . In fact, any such endeavor is a test of wills, and there are no guarantees." Petraeus also acknowledged the burden that the troop surge puts on military members and their families, including his own. But, the general said, withdrawing troops quickly would be irresponsible of the United States and disastrous for Iraq.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), the Senate Armed Services committee's ranking member and a staunch supporter of the president's plan, said the United States has an obligation to finish the job it started. The support from McCain, a presidential contender for 2008, stood in stark contrast to the opposition from other contenders, including Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), and Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.).

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Viral outbreak

    Shocking images of high-profile domestic abuse cases put sports leagues…

     

    Unspoken

    Louis Zamperini biopic tells an amazing story but leaves…

     

    Myth makers

    Scholars who doubt Jesus’ existence follow standard conspiracy theory procedure

    Advertisement