Features

Abstinence under attack

AIDS | Changing sexual behavior as a way to fight AIDS gets a warning flag from the government's chief accounting office

Issue: "Faculty follies," April 29, 2006

Lawmakers returning from a two-week recess face calls for action over a controversial report from the General Accountability Office (GAO) released earlier this month and perhaps waiting among stacks of backlogged congressional mail. The 87-page summation concludes that the Bush administration's support for abstinence programs in the treatment of AIDS is undermining other prevention strategies in AIDS crisis zones in Africa and elsewhere.

The report is a startling wake-up to faith-based organizations and others who have long pushed the so-called ABC approach (Abstinence, Be faithful, use Condoms) as a way to lower the spread of AIDS. It is a potential blow to one of the largest spending initiatives put forward by President George Bush. The audit itself is a surprise, coming barely two years into the program and with funding levels for abstinence programs still below the minimum level required by law.

Three years ago President Bush tripled the rate of federal funding to combat AIDS abroad-from $5 billion to $15 billion over five years-and reordered spending priorities to focus on prevention, including training high-risk groups in abstinence before marriage and faithfulness to one partner (AB of ABC). Although passed by Congress, the approach angered critics within the AIDS establishment, whose chief prevention strategy has been condom distribution (C of ABC) and early sex education. By moving money toward community-based groups and churches, the plan became a benchmark for how well the president's compassionate conservatism can fare overseas.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Now the president's own auditing agency suggests that the plan isn't working. "Support for abstinence programs in the treatment of AIDS is undermining other AIDS-prevention strategies," the GAO concluded. It went further to suggest that laws governing the program be modified by Congress to allow more discretion in whether government and private humanitarian groups actually implement AB programs at all.

That conclusion elicited steady calls for change from newspapers around the country. The Minneapolis Star Tribune said Congress and the Bush administration "should not insist that abstinence and fidelity be such high priorities everywhere." The Salt Lake Tribune called the report "long overdue" and said, "The current policy stubbornly promotes conservative Christian attitudes. . . . Preaching abstinence can do little to halt the spread of HIV in Africa when many people there don't understand the dangers of unprotected sex." And the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, calling for an end to the administration's "abstinence obsession," said a U.S. AIDS-fighting strategy ought to focus "more clearly on saving lives, not reshaping morality to fit a red-states political agenda."

But big print editorial boards, along with lawmakers, may need to look more closely at the report's fine print. While the GAO claims to focus on all 15 countries eligible for funding under the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), auditors conducted site visits to only four of those countries (Botswana, Ethiopia, South Africa, and Zambia). The GAO sent requests for information to foreign teams in five countries but received data back from only two.

Elsewhere the GAO conducted "structured interviews" by phone with government officers based in U.S. embassies and nongovernmental agencies, or NGOs, large enough to have Washington offices. According to an appendix, GAO researchers surveyed six leading NGOs out of the hundreds that contract under the plan. And they granted anonymity to those who responded, a detail noted only in its finest print, a footnote attached to the appendix. Asked by WORLD to name those NGOs, the report's author, David Gootnick, declined. The general information contained in the appendix, he said, "is the publicly available information that is pertinent to your request."

The methods behind such methodology may be significant. The GAO report comes at a time when federal agencies supervising the AIDS plan are cutting back on grants to longtime social-service contractors-those the report hints provided information to the GAO-in favor of grassroots and faith-based organizations.

In the past year the Bush administration has cut funding to CORE, a leading AIDS-fighting consortium. It also reduced grants to Family Health International (FHI) and Population Services International (PSI), both leading condom distributors who reluctantly shifted program focus under the Bush plan two years ago in order to qualify for abstinence-based funding ("Hooked on failure," Nov. 6, 2004).

PSI staff in Uganda complained after they were forced to remove posters, billboards, and radio ads promoting condom use in 2004, with public-service messages urging youth to delay sex until marriage going up around Kampala in their place. PSI deputy director Susan Mukasa told the Associated Press that the portion of the group's U.S. prevention funding this year was not renewed, dropping its PEPFAR level from $600,000 to $100,000.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Gracepoint

    The primary difference between the brilliant British series Broadchurch

    Advertisement