Interview | Being a faithful Christian in Hollywood is about making excellent movies, says filmmaker Scott Derrickson-even excellent horror movies like The Exorcism of Emily Rose

Issue: "New Orleans: Starting over," Sept. 24, 2005

Scott Derrickson is a member of an elite group in Hollywood-a professed Christian working within the studio system and achieving commercial success. Perhaps even more surprising: This writer/director's genre of choice-at least so far-is horror. Mr. Derrickson's latest film, The Exorcism of Emily Rose, uses horror as a springboard to tackle some serious spiritual issues (see movie review, Sept. 10). The film garnered over $30 million in its opening weekend, Sept. 9-11, topping the box office and surprising industry analysts.

WORLD: Why did you bring the story of Emily Rose to the screen?

Derrickson: I first heard about the true story when I was in New York doing research for a script I was writing for Jerry Bruckheimer. I met with a guy who was very familiar with the story, and after learning about it, I knew that it would make a great basis for a movie because it involved both courtroom drama and horror-two genres that I had never seen blended before.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

WORLD: Was this a story you were set on directing yourself?

Derrickson: Yes. I was only willing to sell the screenplay if I was the director. I felt that the subject matter was so unique, it needed to be handled just right. It would have been very easy for another director to push the story in the wrong direction.

WORLD: You're obviously very much attracted to the horror genre. Why?

Derrickson: Horror is the genre with the most sensitive moral compass. No other genre defines good and evil better. No other genre allows for spiritual and religious content more than horror. And it's perhaps the most cinematically explosive genre-it really allows you to use sounds and images in an aggressive way. Thematically, I love the fact that horror can so easily blend with the issues of faith that interest me. Dante's Inferno and C.S. Lewis' The Screwtape Letters are big inspirations for me-they both show how gothic storytelling can convey deep and provocative ideas. . . . The danger of the genre is that it can easily cross over into exploitation. It's easy for the graphic nature of the genre to go way beyond what is needed to effectively tell the story.

WORLD: Why is Emily Rose much more serious than most horror films?

Derrickson: I want people to walk away from the film asking themselves (and whomever they attended the film with) serious spiritual and theological questions. Do I believe in demons? Is there a spiritual realm? Does the Devil exist, and if so does God exist? What are the implications of that belief? I'm not trying to propagate my own point of view with this film-it's not about providing metaphysical answers, but rather it's about asking the right questions. . . . I know that everyone who pays to see the film is going to want to get scared, so I made a very scary movie-but beyond that, I hope they are pleased with the unexpected elements of the film.

WORLD: One of the remarkable elements of the film is that an agnostic (attorney Erin Bruner) defends the priest and ultimately makes the case for a spiritual understanding of Emily's life, while a Christian (prosecutor Ethan Thomas) acts as the skeptic. Can you describe the development of these two characters?

Derrickson: The important thing to me was to portray spiritual progress in a realistic way. Those of us who believe often came to belief through a process, not a single transforming experience. I was interested in seeing a slice of Erin's journey, not her final destination.

I'm very proud of how complex the Ethan Thomas character became in the script. The strategy of having the Christian act as the skeptic, and the agnostic argue for faith-that was all to avoid the clichés that you usually get in courtroom and horror films. I didn't want the atheist antagonist arguing the scientific perspective while the believer defends mystery. That's just boring and it would limit the audience's choices to an oversimplified either/or. I wanted to show that unbelievers can grow spiritually, and that Christians can be intelligent. . . . I don't want people leaving the film feeling that they've been preached at. I want them feeling that the movie has left the issues on the table, and that it's up to them to choose what they believe.

WORLD: The film strongly reflects a Catholic understanding of our engagement with the spiritual world. How do you expect religious and nonreligious audiences will respond?

Derrickson: Well, I'm not Catholic, I'm a Protestant like you, and I identify quite a bit with Ethan Thomas. But the truth is, I don't think there is any way to look at this case-regardless of your beliefs-without feeling challenged in some way. That's the point, I suppose: that there is no easy answer to the questions this film raises. It's meant to pull everybody a bit out of their comfort zone. My hope is that it causes people to consider what they believe, and to discuss that belief more often. There can never be too much spiritual and theological conversation as far as I'm concerned, and when it comes to cinema, we have far too little of it.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Life with Lyme

    For long-term Lyme patients, treatment is a matter of…