Features

Resisting labels

Interview | Ron Sider speaks on abortion, health care, poverty, and calls for Democrats to move to the center on social issues

Issue: "Senate wars over judges," May 14, 2005

Ronald J. Sider, Professor of Theology, Holistic Ministry and Public Policy and Director of the Sider Center on Ministry and Public Policy at Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary, is also President of Evangelicals for Social Action. He has published 27 books, including Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger, called by Christianity Today one of the 100 most influential religious books of the 20th century. He is also the publisher of PRISM magazine and a contributing editor of Christianity Today and Sojourners.

Mr. Sider's new book, The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience (Baker, 2005), charges that "blatant disobedience" to the Bible has become "widespread in evangelical circles." Last year he was quoted as saying he was "within a hair's breadth of concluding that the [Bush] faith-based initiative is a cynical cover for ignoring the poor." WORLD has criticized over the years some of Mr. Sider's ideas, and we wanted to give him an opportunity here to make his case.

WORLD: You are pro-life. Given the millions of children slaughtered by abortionists, how can there be a more important social issue? How can Christians take seriously liberals' claim to stand up for the poor and marginalized, given their fanatical pro-abortion stance?

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

SIDER: I do not say that there is any issue that is "more important" than a pro-life movement to reduce abortion. What I do say-and so does the new official public policy document of the National Association of Evangelicals-is that anybody who wants to be genuinely Christian in their political engagement must embrace a "biblically balanced agenda." That means we must search in the Bible to see what it tells us about God's concerns. When we do that, we find that God cares deeply about the family and the poor, the sanctity of human life and racial justice and creation care. If we are going to be biblical, we must have a biblically balanced agenda.

WORLD: You make a strong biblical case that Christians should help the poor. But isn't "compassionate conservatism," with its personal involvement, faith-based initiatives, and individual attention to human needs, of more genuine help to the poor than welfare bureaucracies that subsidize poverty and therefore keep people poor?

SIDER: I have been an enthusiastic supporter of President Bush's faith-based initiative. I would be delighted if a revival of compassion would sweep through the churches with the result that every family on welfare would be "adopted" by a Christian family that provided more generously for their needs, and loved, prayed, and supported them into growing self-sufficiency and economic independence.

What I deplore is a failure to have the right kind of public policies that guarantee that any American who works full-time responsibly would get out of poverty and have affordable health insurance. Millions of Americans work full-time and do not even earn enough to reach the poverty level. Forty-five million lack health insurance. For the richest nation in history, that is blatantly immoral.

WORLD: You criticize Christians who support policies that are "pro-rich," meaning economic policies that are pro-business and pro-capitalism. But doesn't the evidence show overwhelmingly-for example, in nations like India-that free markets do more to eliminate poverty than socialistic welfare states?

SIDER: I am not anti-business or anti-capitalism. Read Chapter 8 of my Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger (the fifth edition came out in April) where I explicitly argue that a market economy is the best framework we know today for organizing economic life. I also point out that the embrace of a market framework is the primary reason the poverty level has dropped dramatically in Asia in the last couple of decades.

What I object to are tax policies like those of the last few years that give about 70 percent of the tax cuts to the richest 20 percent. In fact, 26 percent went to the richest 1 percent. I embrace programs like expanded Pell grants so kids from poor families can afford college. I support expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit that rewards work and adds another 40 cents for every dollar earned by very low-income workers. I support removing the huge marriage penalty that still exists in the EITC. President Bush has rightly removed almost all other marriage penalties in the tax code, but not this one that hurts the working poor.

WORLD: You say that evangelicals should be working for "structural changes" in society and in the economy. Typically, those who demand structural changes are pushing for more governmental control of the economy. What structural changes do you think we should work for?

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading