Columnists > Mailbag


Letters from our readers

Issue: "Lavelle's wonderful life," Dec. 25, 2004

Astonishing depth

I have watched Princeton philosopher Peter Singer debate ("Blue-State philosopher," Nov. 27). The depth to which the human mind and soul can sink when one's intellect and logic are devoid of spiritual moorings is astonishing. I empathize with him and can even understand his anger toward God over the devastation wrought upon his family during the reign of Hitler, but he is guilty of the same faulty reasoning used by many such despots: that certain subgroups of humans are less "human" than others. This clears the way for the justification and ultimately the implementation of all kinds of atrocities.
-Stephen A. Renae; Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

Prof. Singer makes a very persuasive argument that one cannot make a logical distinction between abortion and infanticide; it's perhaps the best reductio ad absurdum available against abortion.
-George Firebrand; St. Paul, Minn.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

As an American teaching philosophy at Prof. Singer's former university, I think you should report the reasons for Prof. Singer's conclusions, not just the conclusions themselves. As a preference utilitarian, he thinks that moral decisions should be based on considerations about harm and benefit to creatures capable of suffering or joy. Regarding infanticide, there are some babies born whose lives are constituted by so much more pain than joy that it is a mercy to give them an overdose of morphine. You would do the same for your dog if he were so badly injured. The infant has no concept of himself as a continuing subject; as such, he can have no desire to continue to exist.
-Dirk Baltzly; Melbourne, Australia

The Nuremberg trials happened because the world believed that there was an objective moral standard to which the Nazis could be held accountable. Apart from that standard we all just become a law unto ourselves. Mr. Singer's ideas affirm Dostoyevsky's insight that without God everything is permissible.
-Lawrence Kenney; Pottstown, Pa.

Means a lot

As state chaplain for the Virginia National Guard, let me say thank you for the tribute to our military in "Fallujah's fallen" (Nov. 27). It means a lot to those of us, and our families, who are involved with the War on Terror.
-Col. R.T. Leever; Goldsboro, N.C.

More discussion?

In asserting that "some 'moral values' deserve a good bit of discussion. Some need none at all" ("Moral values 101," Nov. 27), Joel Belz nails the fundamental nature of the religious war on good moral values. God's Word is given for and needs to be heard by all people, not just Christians. We dare not remain silent about what God considers so important.
-Ken Howard; Eagle Creek, Ore.

The issues of abortion, homosexuality, and marriage require more discussion because civil discourse with the backing of sound doctrine has not happened between the church and the world. You have to engage culture; it doesn't come prancing up and ask for salvation. We need further discussion because "they" don't know the truth.
-Jonathan Scott; Muncie, Ind.

Thank you for writing what too many Christians either fail to discern or lack the courage to say aloud. For precisely the reasons you cited, Christians should have greater vigor in opposing the rush to normalize perversity. As Isaiah wrote, "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil."
-Mark Landsbaum; Diamond Bar, Calif.

Mommy myth

Thank you for the article on Carla Barnhill and her book The Myth of the Perfect Mother ("Multifaceted moms," Nov. 27). Mrs. Barnhill suggests that churches create opportunities for women at all stages of life to interact, and I fully agree. Many "women's" events at church are really mothers' events. I would like to see the invisible curtain at church events come down so that women can display that they still have the talents and interests that they possessed before they were moms. This would facilitate developing real relationships at church with my sisters in Christ.
-Heather Peters; Stafford, Va.

"Multifaceted moms" subdues the feminist leanings of Carla Barnhill. In her book, Mrs. Barnhill offers "a new theology of motherhood," speaks of "the cult of the family," and challenges evangelical church teaching on motherhood. Yes, child rearing is hard at times, but I do not believe Mrs. Barnhill's whiney diatribe is justified.
-Char Pulliam; Stevensville, Mont.

Let us hope churches do not label Carla Barnhill a feminist and thus refuse to listen. The problem is worse than the failure to "support mothers" and to help them gain "deep relationships." Women are viewed as victims of bad husbands and bad parents rather than as sinners in need of redemption.
-Carol Tharp; Winnetka, Ill.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…