Columnists > Voices

We the People

Moral issues were the key to President Bush's victory on Nov. 2

Issue: "Bush's moral mandate," Nov. 13, 2004

"We the people" voted on Nov. 2 in a way that may redefine for decades who "we the people" are and what authority we have.

President Bush won because "moral issues" were more important than any others for one-fifth of the voters, and the president won that fifth by at least a 4-1 majority. To put it another way, Sen. Kerry probably received about 56 percent of the vote from people most concerned with foreign policy or economic issues, the traditional subjects for presidential campaigns.

Chief among the moral issues is the matter of life and death called abortion. Although that horror did not by name play a large part in the campaign, when it did come up it seems to have worked once again to the advantage of pro-life candidates and the detriment of those who are ready to exclude the weakest among us, unborn children, from being part of "we the people."

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Marriage is another moral issue: In 11 of 11 states, including liberal Oregon, voters by generally huge majorities declared their belief that it should be between a man and a woman. "We the people" clearly are unwilling to bow before the preferences of "we the judges"-and if some judges don't back off from arrogantly trying to write their beliefs into law, their authority is likely to be circumscribed one way or another.

In fact, with the Senate strengthened by the addition of Tom Coburn, Jim DeMint, Mel Martinez, and John Thune, next year would be a good time to push for a constitutional amendment that would restrain judicial authority on the sanctity of life and marriage. We're much better off trusting "we the people" than our overreaching judicial overseers.

Another moral issue for many Christians, as it should be for all, is the plight of the poor and the way they should be helped by the affluent. The welfare state failed because it excludes poor individuals from "we the people" by asserting that they are like pets: Put food in their bowls but don't expect them to act as responsible adults capable of giving as well as taking.

The Bush faith-based initiative became controversial because it asserted that the poor are full human beings with spiritual as well as material needs. It stated as well that those who want to help the poor are also part of "we the people" and should not be forced to act like mere materialists when offering aid and hope. With this moral ratification of President Bush's goals by a crucial segment of voters, the initiative should gain new life.

This election also showed the success of the American experiment in having "we the people" encompass a variety of religious and racial/ethnic groups. John Kerry's Catholicism was a campaign issue only in that it was nominal and seemed to represent packaging rather than personal belief. Evangelicals generally expressed concern not that he was too Catholic but that he wasn't Catholic enough.

The election also showed that Democrats cannot take Hispanics for granted. The president apparently received 40 percent to 45 percent of the votes within that ethnic group. Early indications that he would double his vote among African-Americans from 10 percent to 20 percent may not have worked out, but strong moral concerns among blacks are likely to lead more of them to abandon the liberal plantation. This is all to the best: Much better for parties to have ideological consistency and demographic diversity than to become class or racial blocs.

Democrats now are pondering their next steps. They're already saying about John Kerry and John Edwards, "Off with their heads" (or at least their hair). But the Democratic problem is not personnel or tactics: It's mission drift. Democrats have become the autocratic party, arguing that moral issues should be decided by judges, officials, or panels of bioethicists. Now it's up to George W. Bush to push hard for decentralizing measures-school vouchers, poverty-fighting tax credits-that will give more authority to "we the people."

To help in this process, Christian conservatives need to push hard on educational, judicial, and poverty-fighting issues. In 2001, for example, the first eight months of the faith-based initiative were largely wasted because the White House tried to placate the left rather than move forward vigorously. School vouchers also lost out as Ted Kennedy had his way. Those mistakes should not be repeated.

Marvin Olasky
Marvin Olasky

Marvin is editor in chief of WORLD News Group and the author of more than 20 books, including The Tragedy of American Compassion. Follow Marvin on Twitter @MarvinOlasky.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Job-seeker friendly

    Southern California churches reach the unemployed through job fairs 


    After a fiery trial

    Intelligent design proponent David Coppedge reflects on his wrongful termination…