Columnists > Mailbag


Letters, feedback, etc.

Issue: "Rathergate," Sept. 25, 2004

True love votes

Bob Jones reports yet again that evangelicals and social conservatives may sit out the election because in their minds no one is paying attention to their concerns ("GOP's encore," Aug. 28). To be piously disengaged is to forfeit any right to complain. Christian values have shaped the culture of America from the beginning, but if evangelicals are not willing to do the minimum-that is, to vote-to fight for the culture they say they love, why do they deserve it at all?
-Bill Sappington; Homosassa, Fla.

The GOP did not keep social issues completely in the shadows at their convention, thanks to speakers such as Michael Reagan, Gov. Romney, and President Bush himself. Now the battle is intensified for evangelicals in the next two months; what percentage of professing evangelicals will vote, and vote their profession?
-Stephen W. Leonard; Vidalia, Ga.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

The Aug. 28 issue was right-on in describing a number of stumbling blocks to good governance. Many political partisans may intend to provide good government but that is not the nature of political parties, whose fundamental nature is to gain and wield power. The American party system seemed successful when it was policed by a broad base of citizens committed to the Judeo-Christian ethic, but as that consensus fragments so our nation becomes less and less governable.
-Gary L. Thurman; Midland, Texas

Radio daze

I read Joel Belz's "Missing the point" (Aug. 28) after listening to NPR's coverage of the Republican National Convention and hearing an uncharacteristic parade of conservative guests on its shows. I was surprised at how many thoughtless questions the hosts threw out and pleased at how many thoughtful, logical, and articulate answers the conservative guests returned. Most of the hosts and commentators spoke like anthropologists describing the habits of an unfamiliar tribe. NPR has a long way to go before it is truly radio that represents the national public.
-Julie Dawson; Gardnerville, Nev.

Mr. Belz suggested that the liberal/conservative debate "is really over the nature of truth." I once saw a call-in show during which an NEA spokesman stated she did not believe in objective truth, only "politically useful positions." Today, liberals see John Kerry's testimony as a representative of Vietnam Veterans Against the War as a shining example of a "greater truth" because what he said was politically useful, while it infuriates conservatives because his "facts" were wrong.
-J.F. Feitshans; Houston, Texas

Reach more

Gene Edward Veith suggests that churches might be more effective if both pastors and lay people focused on things consistent with their callings. CEOs, for example, should help administer the church, freeing up pastors for prayer and other ministry ("Called out," Aug. 28). Many believers, both pastors and people, misunderstand their role, calling, and season of life, so it is good to encourage us all to know who we are and what we are called to do. However, in many churches the pastor is the only minister and the people are the "administers." As a pastor, I believe I should be an administrator/minister-a player/coach, if you will-and the people should be the ministers, reaching more people than the pastor, by himself, ever could.
-Rick Biesiadecki; Covington, Ga.

Much more

Thanks to Andree Seu for "Nothing more than feelings?" (Aug. 28). Just as God's relationship to His children is based on His commitment to the New Testament covenant He made for us at the cross, so our relationship with our spouses must be based on our commitment to the covenant we make at the marriage altar. In my premarital counseling as a pastor, I always stressed this commitment to the vows as the key to keeping the marriage intact. It will trump feelings and the temptations to infidelity.
-David R. Christenson; Lynnwood, Wash.

The subject of Mrs. Seu's beautifully written column is vital in a society where the concept of covenant is foreign to many and feelings reign supreme. In 42 years of marriage, we have found God faithful to provide the wisdom, forgiveness, and power we need to "do it" His way when living and relating according to our feelings would have meant shipwreck for us and our family.
-Kathleen Schalla; Blaine, Minn.

I commend Mrs. Seu for addressing a problem among both men and women, including Christians. As a marriage and family therapist, however, I take issue with her suggestion to pray for the object of one's affections because doing so can keep him or her in the mind's eye. To break any budding emotional tie, commit that person to the Lord once in prayer, and then when unwanted thoughts reoccur, say, "No!"
-George H. Harvey; Norfolk, Va.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…