Columnists > Mailbag


Issue: "Arafat: The devil you know," Sept. 20, 2003

"Held back" really lit my fire. Mrs. Waagmeester believes that taxpayers should subsidize religious instruction they oppose. Secular humanism is a religion and its proselytizers are the public-school teachers. I am offended that my tax dollars support it. Where does that leave me? Also, taxpayer funding of public education is not so much a "social contract" as extortion. - Melanie McBride, Fayetteville, Ga.

I grew up in a conservative Christian home in Alabama, but I vehemently disagree with Justice Moore's methods. The Decalogue monument was not selected by the people, the legislature, or any other group representing the people of Alabama but by Justice Moore himself. If he wins, then the door is open for who-knows-what in courthouses, legislative buildings, and other public places. - Ben Thomas, Stuart, Va.

Regarding Mr. Olasky's urging that we should choose issues so Christianity is seen as "warm-hearted but tough-minded," Justice Moore's stand communicates that the moral law of God is the only proper foundation of civil law. Without this moral foundation, we are left with warm-hearted and tough-minded judges who compassionately protect atheists from public expressions of religion. If we reject God's perfect law of liberty as the foundation of civil law, then the fallible laws of tyrants will rule. - Steven Warhurst, Kingsport, Tenn.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

In reading "Christ at the movies," I was disheartened to hear the same mantras I've heard my entire life regarding art. To say that preaching is the preferred form of spreading the gospel and that movies or art can only show but not tell leaves artists like me wondering why God gave us these gifts. - Julie Neidlinger, Hampden, N.D.

"Christ at the movies" was excellent. She raised the same issues that my seminary friends and I have been discussing for the last few years. As much as I love good literature and drama, preaching is God's appointed means of evangelism. - Brian Collins, Greenville, S.C.

Worse by far

Hooray for Gene Edward Veith's "Wandering shepherds" (Aug. 23). Heresy is more harmful than homosexuality. Those bishops who voted to install Mr. Robinson are worse by far than he is. Here's hoping the bishops who voted against heresy will have the fortitude to defend their faith and lead their flocks to a higher plane. If they stay in the Episcopal church and wring their hands for another 20 years, they will be preaching to bare walls. - Ellen Verell, Meade, Kan.

Dream on

Concerning "An improbable dream" (Aug. 23): As a member of the biology faculty, I would respond that Baylor University's dream is a difficult one but not "improbable." Baylor professors are seeking to create innovative, Christian approaches to areas of study that have been traditionally "owned" by secular paradigms. WORLD should encourage such efforts strongly, just as it encourages politicians, authors, and citizens who seek to change society and advance God's kingdom. - Christopher Kearney, Woodway, Texas

License to slide

This downhill trend in society ("One-way traffic," Aug. 9) can be explained by Fisher Ames, who said, "The known propensity of democracy is to licentiousness which the ambitious call and the ignorant believe to be liberty." Most of the downhill acts of licentiousness are rationalized as "liberty" equated with "civil rights," such as abortion and homosexuality. For evil to be accepted it must be disguised as good. Christianity is under attack because it is viewed as an intrusion and a restriction on civil rights and liberty. We are in a cultural war between those who believe God knows what's best for man and those who believe man knows best. - Bill Champion, Boulder City, Nev.

Universal benefit

Thank you for your recent focus on education ("Held back," Aug. 23). I appreciated the coverage of anti-voucher parents and their reasons; it will help voucher proponents make better arguments of their own. Society as a whole is better served when parents have educational alternatives that would otherwise be unaffordable. All of society benefits, not just the voucher families. Enlarging the concept of "public education" to "publicly funded education" with its universal benefit should become a strategic goal of the voucher movement. - Thadd Buzan, Springfield, Va.

Teachers unions know school choice won't reduce funding to good public schools because families will choose them. Choice threatens funding only to rotten public schools that families rightly wish to flee. For the children's sake, let's hope suburbanites discern the distinction soon. - Lil Tuttle, Richmond, Va.

I have a different objection to vouchers you did not mention. When private schools accept government money, they are opening themselves up to government control. One reason we homeschool our children is for the freedom to teach them as my husband and I believe, especially regarding Christian foundations and worldview. - Natalie Polutta, Acworth, Ga.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…