| 4 | | pro-life, pro-flag | | Is the third or fourth-or fifth-time a charm? The House last week by large margins passed legislation favored by social conservatives. But that's nothing new: Bans on both partial-birth abortion and flag-burning have passed before in the more conservative lower chamber. This time, however, one or both of the measures might be successful. A one-line constitutional amendment ("The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States") passed on a vote of 300-125 just in time for Flag Day on June 14. The House approved the measure by similar margins in 1995, 1997, 1999, and 2001. The Senate has always been tougher, however. With a two-thirds majority needed to pass, the bill has never mustered more than 63 votes in the upper chamber, four fewer than necessary. The GOP's Senate sweep in the 2002 elections gives the bill a fighting chance, but no one is calling it a sure thing. After eight long years, the more substantive abortion bill, sponsored by Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio), does look like a sure thing. The usually balky Senate went first this time, prohibiting the partial-birth procedure by a vote of 64-33 back in March. The House, which has always voted enthusiastically on the measure, did so again on Wednesday, approving it by a margin of 282-139. President Bush is eager to sign the protections into law, unlike his predecessor, who twice vetoed a similar bill. Look for NARAL and other pro-abortion groups to appeal to the courts before the president's signature has a chance to dry. | |
Comments
You must be a WORLD print, online, or iPad subscriber to post comments.