| 1 | | un plugged | | Workers at the UN Office of the Iraq Program could be receiving pink slips after the Security Council voted on May 22 to end almost 13 years of sanctions against Iraq. A resolution ending the sanctions regime passed 14-0, with Syria boycotting the meeting. It capped a month-long campaign by President Bush, who urged that sanctions be dropped once U.S. forces liberated Iraq. Veto-wielding Security Council members France and Russia wanted to keep sanctions in place to retain UN (read: European) control of Iraq's oil and lucrative postwar reconstruction contracts. Instead, the measure grants the United States and Britain political and economic authority in Iraq until an internationally recognized, representative government is installed in Baghdad. The UN sanctions regime at one time employed nearly 4,000 people in Iraq, along with a substantial staff overseeing the oil-for-food program and nearly 10 separate UN agencies it took to run it from New York, Paris, Geneva, Rome, and Nairobi. Thanks to Iraq's oil wealth, they oversaw a fund flow of $15 billion a year, more than five times the UN's annual operating budget. Beyond the immediate implications for Iraq, the vote has important implications for the international body, which faced irrelevancy after the rancor over going to war. U.S. opponents on the Security Council chose to unite behind Mr. Bush after lengthy negotiations on the language of the resolution-a return to diplomacy as usual at UN headquarters. It was also a symbolic end to a program that in reality ended months earlier. Weapons inspectors and others UN staff left Baghdad and suspended the oil-for-food program in March just ahead of war. Under sanctions, UN diplomats were notably ineffective in prompting Saddam Hussein to divulge his weapons program and other violations of the sanctions. They scored better at distributing basic aid to all parts of the country with some of the oil-for-food proceeds, and plan to move over $900 million in aid to Iraq before the program expires on June 3. | |
Comments
You must be a WORLD print, online, or iPad subscriber to post comments.