| 2 | | no pork for oil | | "I'm mad enough to eat nails right now," seethed Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) after losing a Senate vote to place up to 1.4 million barrels of Alaskan crude per day on the volatile oil market. The congressional debate over oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge has been going on for 15 years, and supporters thought last week represented their best chance to open 2,000 acres to drilling. It may have been, but they lost, 52-48. Eight Republicans broke ranks on an amendment to strip from the budget resolution a provision that approved drilling. Opponents generally and the Republican defectors especially will feel the wrath of Sen. Stevens, chairman of the appropriations committee, the powerful panel that decides how federal money is spent. "People who vote against this today are voting against me and I will not forget," he declared, appearing to aim his remarks at the amendment's sponsor, Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.). Said Sen. Boxer: "When one of the most powerful senators says he takes it personally, and he's keeping a list.... Well, my heart really started to beat faster." Environmentalists' hearts beat for the polar bears, caribou, and migratory birds they believe will be harmed by oil exploration. Supporters counter that modern technology could extract the oil without disturbing wildlife, that the drilling area is relatively small, and that the economic benefit of putting on the market more oil than currently produced by either California or Texas outweighs the risks. | |
Comments
You must be a WORLD print, online, or iPad subscriber to post comments.