Voices > Mailbag

Mailbag

Issue: "The $10 billion gamble," April 6, 2002

Reading enough

Thank you for "The left wing" in the March 9 issue describing the political views of Aaron Sorkin, creator of NBC's The West Wing. I tell my friends how Hollywood executives use their media to promote their ideology and to slander conservative Republicans, but they "Pshaw!" me and say that I'm reading too much into the shows. - Jenny Doig, Croton, Ohio

Medical instruments

As a physician, I agree with your assessment of the "Charter on Medical Professionalism" ("Hypocritical oath," March 9). The Hippocratic oath has been a problem for the medical profession since Roe vs. Wade because many physicians began to do abortions despite the pledge they took upon graduation, a very public and easily recognized inconsistency. Medical ethicists warn that doctors must maintain their integrity lest they become "instruments of political purposes." Why, I wonder, would certain leaders feel compelled to replace the Hippocratic oath if not to become such an instrument? I hope that members of the medical profession recognize the duplicity that characterizes today's medical leaders. - Glenn P. Dewberry Jr., Oklahoma City, Okla.

Now more than ever

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

The only surprise about the "Charter on Medical Professionalism" is that it was so long coming. The ugly truth is that the Hippocratic oath was not so recently abandoned. When I graduated from the University of South Dakota School of Medicine in 1974, the only controversy was which watered-down version to use, or whether to recite the oath at all. As a member of the American Association of Pro-Life OBGYNs, I have spoken to pro-life medical groups shocked to learn that a physician is not required to refer an abortion-minded patient to an abortion clinic. They are even more shocked when I say it is OK to discourage such a patient from seeking an abortion (an easy task, what with hemorrhage, infection, infertility, hysterectomy and death all possibilities) and to lovingly present abortion alternatives. Such counseling is anathema to the "Patient Autonomy Is the Only Ethic that Matters" crowd, who teach that a doctor should never inject morality into the doctor-patient relationship-unless it's to discourage smoking or owning a handgun. Hippocrates got it right, mostly, the first time. The principles he outlined are timeless and needed now more than ever. - Matt Anderson, Burlington, Iowa

Worth it

Whenever I renew my subscription to WORLD, I struggle a bit because money is tight. Then, after I send off a 3-year renewal, you come out with two stunning issues back-to-back. Your Special Issue on Jewish/ Christian relations, "O brother, where art thou?" and your March 9 cover story on North Korea are worth an entire year's subscription each. Please continue reporting on issues like these that shape (or should shape) our thinking and prayer life but rarely receive coverage in the secular media. - Ken Brooks, Danbury, Conn.

Labor of love

Thank you for the outstanding Special Issue on Jewish/Christian relations ("O brother, where art thou?") As an Israeli history teacher in a Christian high school, I am thrilled to see you address the subject. Your timeline of notable Jewish Christians is a thorough and well-done piece of research. I really appreciate your labor of love, and will be using it in my classes for years to come. - Cynthia Gill, Excelsior, Minn.

Insightful

Your Special Issue on Jewish/Christian relations is the greatest yet. Mr. Olasky's articles and column were very insightful. After reading these I wept more than I have for years. This issue is a special keeper for me. My faith in Jesus and love for the Jews have been much strengthened by it. - Thomas Abney, Ozark, Mo.

Too late

You observe that "Wal-Mart may soon face an entirely new challenge: how to keep the size and bureaucracy of the company from shifting its focus away from service to customers" ("Chain smokes," March 2). It's too late. I have watched sadly as my local store has slid downward in the years since Mr. Walton died. Once a faithful Wal-Mart shopper and small-time stockholder, I now avoid entering the store whenever possible. - Katie Walker, Washington, Mo.

Why?

I have used the NIV Bible for the past 20 years and have always recommended this translation to those who couldn't understand the KJV. However, since following the story of the TNIV, I will no longer recommend any version of the NIV ("Trust me," Feb. 23). I question the motives of the publishers of such a translation. If they deny any feminist agenda, why do they feel the need for such a change? - Kathy McGrew, Silverhill, Ala.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Good credit

    Competency-based programs offer college credentials without the debilitating cost

     

    Numbers matter

    Understaffing the U.S. effort in Iraq from the beginning…

    Advertisement