Columnists > Mailbag


Issue: "TNIV makes its debut," Feb. 23, 2002

No evidence

Great articles on Enron ("Enwrong," "Bush's Whitewater?" Jan. 26). Both authors presented their information and doubts well. Some liberal journalists seem to have concluded that Vice President Cheney bent over backward to give Enron every advantage he could in federal energy policy, but they are unable to produce real facts to back up their claims. This type of spin is normal, but I'm wondering whether they will begin to use outright lies. - Phil Wade, Chattanooga, Tenn.

Enron done right

Tim Graham may have set the standard for rational reporting in this country. His explanation of the Enron mess is the first I've heard that makes any sense. And the description of pro-regulatory Enron officials as "ideological cross-dressers" was right on target. - Billy Crisler, Melbourne, Fla.


We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Roberta Green's piece is the most lucid explanation I've seen for my gut feeling that Harry Potter (and his creator) crossed the line ("Crossing the line," Jan. 26). - Kathryn Presley, Bryan, Texas

No endorsement

I would disagree with the assertion that if we let our children read Harry Potter we are saying that "it is safe to be a sorcerer." - William A. Bridgforth Jr., Johnson City, Tenn.

Not even a crack

Kudos to Roberta Green for deftly summarizing the trouble with Harry Potter. C.S. Lewis himself experienced the dangers of "crossing the line" into obsession with the occult. In Surprised by Joy, he writes that, partly because of a school matron who dabbled in the occult, "for the first time, there burst upon me the idea that there might be real marvels all about us, that the visible world might be only a curtain to conceal huge realms uncharted by my very simple theology. And that started in me something with which, on and off, I have had plenty of trouble since-the desire for the preternatural, simply as such the passion for the Occult. Not everyone has this disease; those who have will know what I mean. It is a spiritual lust; and like the lust of the body it has the fatal power of making everything else in the world seem uninteresting while it lasts." Some children will read Harry Potter and never struggle with such a lust; but for others, it will open the door for a maleficent obsession. After reading the first Harry Potter novel, I decided that our children do not need that door opened, not even a crack. - Amy Eytchison, Brentwood, Tenn.

Too much

The column on the proposed MTV/Showtime "gay channel" was informative, but I strongly protest the use of the picture of two young homosexuals staring into each others' eyes with lust all over their faces ("Way out of the closet," Jan. 26). - Robert Elliot, Riverside, Calif.

Not all

I usually enjoy your political cartoons, but one in the Jan. 26 issue pushed me over the edge. It portrayed an Enron executive on top of a house of cards, and another man, whose briefcase had on it, "Arthur Andersen," was saying, "Looking good, sir!" Not all Arthur Andersen accountants are Enron-helping toadies. My 7th-grade Sunday school teacher, a strong Christian woman whom I greatly admire, is a partner with the local branch of Arthur Andersen. - Anne-Cara Apple, 14, Philadelphia, Pa.

The right words

As a medical doctor, I was dismayed at the terminology used in the short article, "EC or else" (Jan. 26). In describing a new California law that will allow pharmacists to dispense the "morning-after pill" without a prescription, you said that the emergency contraception pill "will prevent pregnancy," and that the "EC" pills work, among other mechanisms, by "preventing implantation of a fertilized egg." In fact, "emergency contraception" is not reliably contraceptive at all. As you noted, it might prevent conception, but it might well allow conception to occur, and then block implantation of the developing human being. Then the baby will die from lack of nourishment and be washed out with the next menstrual period. This is the moral equivalent of an abortion, which is the moral equivalent of killing a newborn. - Jeremy Klein, Louisa, Ky.


The Jan. 19 issue of WORLD was great ("Roe vs. Wade at 29"), especially the front cover. We mounted the picture of the baby in a man's hand on a piece of plywood and displayed it during our candlelight vigil for the unborn on the streets of Washington, Mo., on Jan. 22. - Jean & Larry Stackhouse, Pacific, Mo.

WORLD away

I read WORLD online while I'm at school, and I really appreciate the perspectives you bring to bear on the news. I also find Andree Seu's columns make good food for thought, and I've been either challenged, humbled, or encouraged by them a number of times ("True convenience," Jan. 19). - Joel Swanson, Atlanta, Ga.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Power campaigns

    The GOP is fighting to maintain control of Congress…


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…