Cover Story

A Cold War for the 21st century

Meeting the challenge of Islam and terrorism will be a twilight struggle on the order of the battle in the 20th century to contain and ultimately defeat communism. Winning this new war starts with an understanding of the enemy and his worldview-and a commitment to defend ours. This WORLD special report examines the Islamic heart and mind, and our role in the war whose first shots were fired on Sept. 11, 2001

Issue: "Islam and teroris," Oct. 27, 2001

Fifty years ago Whittaker Chambers, a Marxist-turned-Christian, wrote in his book Witness that the next several decades would decide "whether all mankind is to become Communist, whether the whole world is to become free, or whether, in the struggle, civilization as we know it is to be completely destroyed or completely changed. It is our fate to live upon that turning point in history."

Chambers was pessimistic-he thought in leaving Communism he was leaving the winning side-because he saw a power among his former comrades. "Their power, whose nature baffles the rest of the world, because in a large measure the rest of the world has lost that power, is the power to hold convictions and to act on them," Chambers wrote. "Communists are that part of mankind which has recovered the power to live or die-to bear witness-for its faith."

The United States decided to make a mighty effort to contain that power. The Cold War had its hot wars in Korea and Vietnam, but with God's grace containment succeeded and the Soviet Union fell. From 1991 to Sept. 11, 2001, the United States enjoyed a decade of victory and peace, marred though it was by flare-ups abroad and scandal at home. Now, though, it is our sad but providential task to face another turning point in history.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

Our new war is similar in some ways to the Cold War. Our opponents are once again men who hold terrifying convictions (although this time they are even willing to kill themselves as they murder others). There are major differences: The Cold War was fought between two superpowers with the ability to obliterate each other, so neither fired a shot directly at the other. Nevertheless, in terms of longevity, dire threats, and the perseverance required for victory, the Cold War is a more fitting model than the 100-hour Gulf War or the four-year war against Germany and Japan.

At the start of Cold (sometimes hot) War I in 1946, Harry Truman and Winston Churchill decided not to characterize that long twilight struggle as a battle of Christianity vs. atheism, but one of freedom vs. dictatorship. They were wise to do so, for the anti-Communist coalition that grew included people of many religions and no religion, and even some socialists. All were needed as the alliance just barely survived Soviet punches that finally came slower and slower until the exhausted threat finally slumped to the canvas.

At the start of Cold (sometimes hot) War II in 2001, George W. Bush has made a similar decision. He has characterized the new conflict not as a battle of Christianity vs. Islam, but one of civilization vs. terror. He is wise to do so, given both the diversity of America and our reliance on the oil of Muslim countries. But this characterization makes it essential to assess whether most Muslims will be willing and able to join a new coalition, or whether Islam is a breeding ground for terrorists.

Marvin Olasky
Marvin Olasky

Marvin is editor in chief of WORLD News Group and the author of more than 20 books, including The Tragedy of American Compassion. Follow Marvin on Twitter @MarvinOlasky.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Job-seeker friendly

    Southern California churches reach the unemployed through job fairs 


    After a fiery trial

    Intelligent design proponent David Coppedge reflects on his wrongful termination…