Features

Creating a new 'market' for international outrage

International | With the White House deaf to the concerns of the Christian minority in Sudan, civil disobedience is now the new standard in the campaign against ethnic cleansing in Africa

Issue: "The McCain craze," Feb. 19, 2000

Declaring that the Clinton administration has "refused to deal with the moral, religious, and human-rights crisis in Sudan," Hudson Institute fellow Michael Horowitz left his think tank confines Feb. 1 and got himself arrested in front of the State Department. The 61-year-old scholar and former Reagan aide has been at the forefront of what has been a largely rhetorical debate, with Christian groups and human-rights advocates on one side, and the Clinton administration alongside investors in Sudan on the other. At stake: how to treat an entrenched Muslim regime that controls the largest land mass in Africa, holds recently discovered oil reserves, and wages war against its Christian population.

Mr. Horowitz told WORLD that he confided his plans to the State Department in advance. So when he trespassed at the main entrance, a Sudan desk officer met him and offered Mr. Horowitz a meeting on the spot with Susan Rice, assistant secretary of state for African affairs. Not good enough, Mr. Horowitz replied.

"I said at this point this issue needs to be dealt with at the level of the secretary [of state] and the president." That being out of the question, Mr. Horowitz was asked to leave the restricted premises of the Foggy Bottom complex, first by the chief of building security, then by D.C. police, who were summoned to the scene. When he refused, he was arrested for trespassing and disobeying an officer. He was held in handcuffs until his release over three hours later.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

What has activists on Sudan heated enough to break the law? They say the executive branch just won't pay attention. Sudan's war of attrition continues, with Muslim fighters from the regime, based in the north, bombing and pillaging Christian villages in the south. Military forces backed by the Islamic government in Khartoum, the capital, have been fighting rebel groups also in the south since 1983, when Islamic rule became the law of the land. Casualties from the war are believed to number over 2 million. Activists say this is ethnic cleansing, and on a scale too large not to show up on the Clinton foreign-policy radar. Frustration peaked this year after Secretary of State Madeleine Albright stated publicly that a campaign against Sudan "is not marketable to the American people."

Her remarks came in spite of the determination of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, which said action against Sudan should be its first order of business. Commission members met with President Clinton and his aides last October to urge the president to use existing executive power to impose economic sanctions. The panel also called on the president and Ms. Albright to speak out against Sudan's persecution of Christians.

The administration has made no move toward public-policy statements or sanctions. Instead, it bolstered imports for soft-drink manufacturers by allowing them to continue to purchase gum arabic from Sudan. (Sources for gum arabic exist elsewhere in Africa, particularly in U.S.-friendly Chad.) The Clinton team also ignored a Dec. 9 letter appealing to the president to end a U.S. food-distribution policy that allows the Khartoum government to block U.S.-financed food aid from entering the southern, Christian-dominated areas of Sudan. It, like other parts of the country, has been plagued by war-induced famine.

Mr. Horowitz told WORLD there has been no reply to that letter. "The time for polite protest has passed," he said. "I now believe that standard processes of political discourse will no longer alter the administration's policies towards the Khartoum regime."

Security insiders agree with that statement. As ethnic fighting and humanitarian tragedies go, Sudan is "not a blip on the radar screen," according to Earl Tilford, director of research at the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Studies Institute. "What they are doing to Christians does not seem to meet a strategic concern, and the military is not looking for any new missions."

The campaign is moving forward even without administration cooperation. Organizers who want to isolate the Islamic regime met the day after Mr. Horowitz's arrest to plot further acts of civil disobedience. Members of the coalition include respected human-rights groups, like Freedom House and the Institute on Religion and Democracy; African-American church leaders, like Chuck Singleton, pastor of the 10,000-member Loveland Church in Los Angeles; evangelical leaders like Prison Fellowship head Chuck Colson; Catholic and Episcopal advocacy groups; and a bipartisan collection of House and Senate lawmakers.

They hope to launch a new phase of activism by mid-March, one that will feature stepped-up, grass-roots activities across the board and more arrests. Mr. Singleton said he would follow the example of Mr. Horowitz in protesting to the point of handcuffs.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

    Advertisement