Columnists > Mailbag


Issue: "The fall(en) TV season," Sept. 18, 1999

Life imitates Huxley

It was a good decision to include Aldous Huxley's Brave New World in your list of top 20th-century books. The nightmare utopia of that world is increasingly similar to ours. The American Psychological Association's report on fatherhood ("The APA does it again," Aug. 21) mimicked the book's idea that "mother" and "father" would be arcane, even obscene, words. The eugenics news ("Eugenics: 1990s style, Aug. 21") mirrored the concept of Huxley's "Hatchery" where humans were bred and conditioned. Your report on Elizabeth Miles's current books touting music as narcotic ("Cultural commodities," Aug. 21) showed their chilling similarity to the drug-saturated "scent organ" music that was used to sedate and pacify the masses. - Drew Dernavich, Bedford, Mass.


I was shocked to read that presidential candidate Sen. John McCain compared the death penalty to the abortion issue ("Is McCain able?" Aug. 21). Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that every one of the over 567 prisoners executed in the United States since 1976 was innocent. As tragic as that would be, can we honestly compare this to the 38 million innocent children aborted since 1973 in this country? Please. - Mark Schulz, Elgin, Ill.

The price is right

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

The article "Burying pricey funerals" (Aug. 21) forever ruined my image of WORLD. Biased sensationalism of funeral-director-wannabes read more like a magazine interested in selling copy, than staying true to a conservative perspective. As a third-generation funeral director, responsible for the financial operation of a family-owned chain of funeral homes, I'm happy to report that pricing at most family-owned funeral homes is reasonable and easily justifiable. Mr. Sillars's article transcends endorsement of econo-deathcare-retailers, vilifying thousands of funeral-service professionals. - J. Todd Snyder, Mansfield, Ohio

A low-cost funeral is available

My husband and I read "Burying pricey funerals" with interest as my husband is a manager in a small-town funeral home owned by SCI. We both appreciated the balanced reporting and agree that funerals are pricey. You can purchase a very inexpensive funeral (less than $2,000) at most funeral homes, but because of guilt people do tend to go overboard. I recommend price comparison between local funeral homes and even those basement bargain shops. An informed consumer can find that low-cost funeral; competition is a definite bargaining tool. - Mary Baxter, Ringgold, Ga.

"Benefits" are irrelevant

Mr. Murray's point about "leaking results" to hide weak research methodology is well-taken, but not always correct ("Eugenics: 1990s style"). I'd guess that the results of this particular study are thorough, given the pedigree of the authors and my familiarity with some of the latter author's work. The results, suggesting that increased abortion is reducing crime rates, shouldn't be troubling in themselves. The existence of "benefits" to abortion is irrelevant to whether the practice is right. - D. Eric Schansberg, New Albany, Ind.

Next time

I was deeply convicted by your article "NIMBY" (Aug. 21) to remember that homosexuality is a thing but homosexuals are people who need our love and prayers. The next time I encounter someone like Doug and am tempted to turn away, I will remember what Barbara did and strive to "conduct myself in a manner worthy of the gospel." - Barbara Schmidt, Fairfield, Calif.

Still balancing

I was so heartened to read Barbara Curtis's compassionate and righteous response to homosexuality. One year in college my roommate-a baby Christian-turned from Jesus to lesbianism and I came to understand what an incredible balancing act it is to "love the sinner, hate the sin." My roommate rejected me because she couldn't allow that I could love her and oppose her choices. I still oppose her choices, but I have never stopped loving her or praying for her. - Shanti Dickson, Monterey, Calif.

Define your terms

If the issue was whether homosexuals should have the right to wear rainbow colored hot-pants at work while reading pornography and distributing pamphlets promoting a gay lifestyle, I would agree with Mr. Belz ("Two lines in the sand," Aug. 21). But the right not to hire someone purely on the basis of his private decisions (so long as they do not impinge on his ability to function at work) is a democratic abomination that legislation should combat. By the same reasoning, our secular society should have the right to deny employment to Christians for their decision to read the Bible at home. I have no problem with Mr. Belz's position if Christian employers can define what intrinsic liability homosexuality carries with it. - Matt Knox, Lake Zurich, Ill.


You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading


    Troubling ties

    Under the Clinton State Department, influence from big money…