Columnists > Mailbag

Mailbag

Issue: "Top 40 Books," July 3, 1999

What a shame

Thank you for staying abreast of the activities of the International Bible Society and its efforts to publish a regendered translation ("There they go again ... " June 5). Many accolades are due for bringing this issue to the public's attention, for monitoring their efforts to slide this by without debate, and for not shrinking from the slings and arrows of the IBS. I find it very difficult to understand the IBS and their intentions. For a Christian organization, they have certainly acted in a very secular manner. I have gone to their website and looked at their explanations. I must say, I find them inadequate and, most tragically of all, I cannot believe anything they now say or will say in the future. Once lost, a good reputation is hard to regain. What a shame. - Shirley L. Covington, Marietta, Ga.

Hellish laughter

From the perspective of Hell, the issue is not whether the church will use inclusive language (Hell doesn't care about that) but whether the church will choose to alter God's Word to make special-interest groups feel more comfortable. The irony is that soon after such concessions are offered, another more drastic measure is demanded. The moment the church, in chorus, says, "We surrender the integrity of God's Word for this most noble of causes," the only applause we will hear is laughter coming from Beneath. - John F. Longmire, Sugarloaf, Pa.

Unconvinced

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

I remain unconvinced by the articles on the regendering debate. Some of the examples cited are certainly egregious. Others seem much less clear-cut and are places where honest believers could disagree about translation practices. - Bill Leal, Athens, Ohio

Every nuance counts

Thank you for your dedication to reporting the actions of Zondervan Publishing and IBS. You are absolutely correct that every nuance of God's Word is of vital importance and should not be changed to fit the worldly ideologies of man. - Lisa Meek, Bothell, Wash.

A troubling resemblance

I'm really concerned with the stance taken by the IBS. It seems that representatives of the IBS have done nothing but lie, mislead, and deny their true intent when questioned about providing a gender-neutral rendition of the NIV. I'm reminded of someone who lives in a large, white house in Washington, D.C. - Fred Spuhler, Richfield, Minn.

Sincere sacrifice

In our cultural environment of relativism, radical feminism, and political correctness, discernment and vigilance are required to preserve the integrity and accuracy of the Word of God. Zondervan may be sincere in its attempt to market a more socially acceptable Bible, but I am apprehensive of any path leading to an altar where scriptural accuracy is sacrificed to the idols of political ideology. - Chet Steffey, Sierra Vista, Ariz.

Just specks

I am greatly saddened to see your barrage of articles again bringing up accusations that International Bible Society has a feminist agenda. Wouldn't we all do better to get on with the task of helping distribute Bibles around the world? No, we in the Christian right-wing camp must spend our time picking specks out of one another's eyes so that we can help our brothers and sisters maintain a patriarchal agenda. - Kathleen Delph, Colorado Springs, Colo.

Dangerous

I agree that there are potential problems with leaving Bible translations with publishers ("A radical proposal," June 5). Yet placing translations in the hands of denominations seems equally dangerous. Wouldn't each denomination be tempted to use words that slanted the meaning of passages toward their doctrinal beliefs? The creation of a new Bible translation should always involve people from multiple denominations. - Brian Schwartz, Wichita, Kan.

Won't happen

Sorry, Tim and David Bayly are naive to think the churches (i.e., the denominations) will preserve the Bible. As an Episcopalian, I assure you it won't happen. Just look at what happened to our beloved English masterpiece, The Book of Common Prayer. - Alzina Stone Dale, Chicago, Ill.

Stuffed

I appreciated Marvin Olasky's insightful comparison between Coca-Cola and IBS and Zondervan in the marketing of their respective products ("Bible cola," June 5). It is disheartening to see God's Word stuffed into the transient mold of societies' trends. - Joli Howard, Libertytown, Md.

No doubt

Since my days in seminary some 20 years ago, I have been a subscriber to Christianity Today. Many was the time I thought I might let that subscription run out, so frustrated did I become with the inconsistency of their evangelical stand. Still, there were many excellent articles, and I felt it kept me in touch with developments in the evangelical world. Then, a few years ago, a friend loaned me his copy of the infamous "Stealth Bible" issue of WORLD. Soon I found myself going to your website to check out each issue, and I knew that this was the magazine for me. I am now in my second subscription year. When I compare your continued excellent coverage of the Bible-regendering issue with CT's "lap dog" defense of the IBS, there is no doubt in my mind which subscription I am going to allow to expire. - Richard C. Klueg, Northville, N.Y.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Darwin made me do it

    Despite obvious facts and contradictions, evolutionary psychologists say nearly every…

     

    Big Hero 6

    Only in an animated film can an obese, mouthless…

    Advertisement