Cover Story

The evolution backlash: Debunking Darwin

"The evolution backlash: Debunking Darwin" Continued...

Issue: "Evolution Counter-Revolution," March 1, 1997

In a dramatic rebuttal, captured on the video, a young man from the audience challenged Mr. Provine, saying, &quotMy background is murder and rape. I once thought that was okay, because who cared about life?" But now, he went on, he had come to realize that &quotlife does matter" and &quotthere are absolutes." The man's words were a stunning reminder that the origins debate is not merely academic; it involves the most fundamental principles by which people live and die.

The Darwinist establishment benefits enormously from portraying the origins debate as a tempest in a teapot, driven by a small, marginalized group of Bible-thumpers. But the public knows intuitively that at stake are the great questions of human existence. The influential Jewish journal Commentary recently published a masterful critique of Darwinism by mathematician and novelist David Berlinski. Reader response was so overwhelming that a later issue devoted nearly 50 pages to letters. The origins debate is clearly entering the mainstream.

&quotThe fundamental and most far-reaching assumption of Darwinism is that life is the product of forces that are impersonal and purposeless--that life is a cosmic accident," Mr. Johnson explains. &quotThis is a philosophy that strikes most Americans as false, not just fundamentalists. If Christians frame the debate that way, we can't be marginalized."

Mrs. Pearcey is co-author of The Soul of Science: Christian Faith and Natural Philosophy.

Nancy R. Pearcey
Nancy R. Pearcey

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    Quake alerts

    Researchers say groups of smartphones may be able to…

     

    Deathly fears

    How to face the overwhelming but inevitable end of…

     

    No concessions

    We must strongly support the rights of those who…

    Advertisement