Features

It begins in the pulpit

National | D. James Kennedy: Evangelism Explosion, political explosion

Issue: "Finster's unusual art," April 27, 1996

Some 1,300 religious liberals-led by Hillary Rodham Clinton's political/spiritual guru Michael Lerner-met last week in Washington to, among other things, denounce the religious right. In San Francisco, more than 50,000 attended the Rev. Jesse Jackson's "fight the right" rally. Why all the fuss? The rise in influence of Christian conservatives and the fear that 1996 will be as bad a year for liberals as it was in 1994. D. James Kennedy, senior pastor of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church, founder of Evangelism Explosion International, is part of the movement so detested by the political left on both coasts. WORLD publisher Joel Belz recently interviewed Dr. Kennedy from his office in Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.

WORLD: With everyone assuming now that Robert Dole is going to be the Republican candidate, but recognizing that he's not the choice of lots of evangelical Christians, where do you see the religious right? Has it been wiped off the board of American politics?

Kennedy: To some small degree. On the other hand, what encourages me is not any particular race, but what is going on beneath the surface. We have that phenomenon now in politics. What is not often seen is the tremendous growth of the number of evangelical Christians in this country.

We see you’ve been enjoying the content on our exclusive member website. Ready to get unlimited access to all of WORLD’s member content?
Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.
(Don’t worry. It only takes a sec—and you don’t have to give us payment information right now.)

Get your risk-free, 30-Day FREE Trial Membership right now.

WORLD: How does this become visible in the political process?

Kennedy: We saw a good example of it in 1994 in the tremendous revolution that took place in our Congress. None of the political pundits took into account what I think really happened. And what happened was: Christians happened. An exit poll asked: "Are you an evangelical born-again Christian?" That's a pretty specific term. In 1988, only 18 percent said yes; in 1992, 24 percent. In 1994, the figure should have gone down because it was a non-presidential election; but in fact it went up to 33 percent.

WORLD: Do those who call themselves evangelical vote in a predictable way?

Kennedy: About 70 percent tended to vote Republican in the 1994 elections. I wrote to all these elected officials and told them what I believed had happened, and I said that whoever is sensitive to the convictions of these people is likely to be in power for a long time.

WORLD: Is there a place for the Christian in the Democratic Party?

Kennedy: If you would have asked me that question 50 years ago, I would have said that of course, without any doubt, an evangelical Christian could be an active Democrat. But something has happened in the last 50 years. The Democratic Party has taken it upon itself to endorse positions such as homosexuality and abortion and things like that that the Bible expressly condemns.

Shouldn't it become increasingly difficult for a genuine Christian to support a party that embraces things like that? A number of other issues could be added to that brief list. So as Lincoln said, the question is not whether God is on our side, but whether we are on God's side. If we are on God's side and we hold to the positions he holds, I think you'll find that whatever party embraces those positions is going to get the enthusiastic endorsement of those who believe in God and believe in his Word.

WORLD: What would you do if the Republican Party nominated someone who endorsed abortion and endorsed homosexual rights-perhaps Mr. Dole's running mate?

Kennedy: That would make for a very, very difficult choice for me or any Christian who believes what God says. I have some friends who say that under such conditions they would not vote at all. I have never had to face what I'd do if both of those were the case.

Those, however, may not even be the most significant issues in the next election. The most significant thing a president does is to appoint Supreme Court justices. I believe that if George Bush had been reelected in 1992, and the two appointments had come up that Bill Clinton filled, it's quite possible that Roe v. Wade would now be dead. Therefore if we had a president who would appoint that kind of Supreme Court justice, I might tolerate some other weaknesses that he had for the sake of the unborn.

WORLD: Do we evangelicals get too preoccupied with politics?

Kennedy: That's a real possibility. We are not saved by government or politics, and my basic press toward government is not to get them to save America, but to get them out of the way. The federal government has proved a tremendous impediment to the ongoing work of Christians. In all the laws that they have passed against Christian schools, gagging the church, taxation, and all kinds of things that they have done, they have made it harder for the church to exercise its prerogatives and to preach the gospel.

Comments

You must be a WORLD member to post comments.

    Keep Reading

     

    From cool to cold

    A long-term study finds middle-school popularity often doesn’t end well